Ariely, D., Au, W. T., Bender, R. H., Budesco, D. V., Dietz, C. B., Gu, H., & Zauberman, G. (2000). The effects of averaging subjective probability estimates between and within judges. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 130–147.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bennett, S. T., Benjamin, A. S., Mistry, P. K., & Steyvers, M. (2018). Making a crowd wiser: Benefits of individual metacognitive control on crowd performance. Computational Brain & Behavior, 1, 90–99.
Article
Google Scholar
Bürkner, P.-C. (2019). Brms: Bayesian Regression Models using 'Stan.' Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/brms/index.html.
Crump, M. J. C., McDonnell, J. V., & Gureckis, T. M. (2013). Evaluating Amazon’s Mechanical Turk as a tool for experimental behavior research. PLoS ONE, 8, e57410.
Article
Google Scholar
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668–1674.
Article
Google Scholar
Fraundorf, S. H., & Benjamin, A. S. (2014). Knowing the crowd within: Metacognitive limits on combining multiple judgments. Journal of Memory and Language, 71, 17–38.
Article
Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1907). Vox populi. Nature, 75, 450–451.
Article
Google Scholar
Herzog, S. M., & Hertwig, R. (2009). The wisdom of many in one mind: Improving individual judgments with dialectical bootstrapping. Psychological Science, 20, 231–237.
Article
Google Scholar
Herzog, S. M., & Hertwig, R. (2014a). Harnessing the wisdom of the inner crowd. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 504–506.
Article
Google Scholar
Herzog, S. M., & Hertwig, R. (2014b). Think twice and then: Combining or choosing in dialectical bootstrapping? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 218–232.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 16385–16389.
Article
Google Scholar
Hourihan, K. L., & Benjamin, A. S. (2010). Smaller is better (when sampling from the crowd within): Low memory-span individuals benefit more from multiple opportunities for estimation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1068–1074.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Indow, T., & Ida, M. (1977). Scaling of dot numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 22, 265–276.
Article
Google Scholar
Ioannou, C. C. (2017). Swarm intelligence in fish? The difficulty in demonstrating distributed and self-organised collective intelligence in (some) animal groups. Behavioural Processes, 141, 141–151.
Article
Google Scholar
Ioannou, C. C., Madirolas, G., Brammer, F. S., Rapley, H. A., & de Polavieja, G. G. (2018). Adolescents show collective intelligence which can be driven by a geometric mean rule of thumb. PLoS ONE, 13, e0204462.
Article
Google Scholar
Izard, V., & Dehaene, S. (2008). Calibrating the mental number line. Cognition, 106, 1221–1247.
Article
Google Scholar
Kornell, N., & Hausman, H. (2017). Performance bias: Why judgments of learning are not affected by learning. Memory & Cognition, 45, 1270–1280.
Article
Google Scholar
Krueger, L. E. (1982). Single judgments of numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 175–182.
Article
Google Scholar
Krueger, L. E. (1984). Perceived numerosity: A comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 536–542.
Article
Google Scholar
Lee, M. D., & Danileiko, I. (2014). Using cognitive models to combine probability estimates. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 259–273.
Google Scholar
Lipton, J. L., & Spelke, E. S. (2005). Preschool children’s mapping of number words to nonsymbolic numerosities. Child Development, 76, 978–988.
Article
Google Scholar
Mellers, B., Ungar, L., Baron, J., Ramos, J., Gurcay, B., Fincher, K., & Tetlock, P. E. (2014). Psychological strategies for winning a geopolitical forecasting tournament. Psychological Science, 25, 1106–1115.
Article
Google Scholar
Merkle, E. C., Steyvers, M., Mellers, B., & Tetlock, P. E. (2016). Item response models of probability judgments: Application to a geopolitical forecasting tournament. Decision, 3, 1–19.
Article
Google Scholar
Merkle, E. C., Steyvers, M., Mellers, B., & Tetlock, P. E. (2017). A neglected dimension of good forecasting judgment: The questions we choose also matter. International Journal of Forecasting, 33, 817–832.
Article
Google Scholar
Minturn, A. L., & Reese, T. W. (1951). The effect of differential reinforcement on the discrimination of visual number. The Journal of Psychology, 31, 201–231.
Article
Google Scholar
Müller-Trede, J. (2011). Repeated judgment sampling: Boundaries. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 283–294.
Google Scholar
Page, S. E. (2007). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Rauhut, H., & Lorenz, J. (2011). The wisdom of crowds in one mind: How individuals can simulate the knowledge of diverse societies to reach better decisions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55, 191–197.
Article
Google Scholar
Steegen, S., Dewitte, L., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vanpaemel, W. (2014). Measuring the crowd within again: a pre-registered replication study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 786.
Article
Google Scholar
Steyvers, M., Lee, M., Miller, B., & Hemmer, P. (2009). The wisdom of crowds in the recollection of order information. In NIPS '09: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 1785–1793). https://doi.org/10.5555/2984093.2984293
Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. New York, NY: Random House.
Google Scholar
Turner, B. M., Steyvers, M., Merkle, E. C., Budesco, D. V., & Wallsten, T. S. (2014). Forecast aggregation via recalibration. Machine Learning, 95, 261–289.
Article
Google Scholar
van Dolder, D., & van den Assem, M. J. (2017). The wisdom of the inner crowd in three large natural experiments. Nature Human Behavior, 2, 21–26.
Article
Google Scholar
Vul, E., & Pashler, H. (2008). Measuring the crowd within: Probabilistic representations within individuals. Psychological Science, 19, 645–647.
Article
Google Scholar
Wagenmakers, E.-J., Lodewyckx, T., Kuriyal, H., & Grasman, R. (2010). Bayesian hypothesis testing for psychologists: A tutorial on the Savage–Dickey method. Cognitive Psychology, 60, 158–189.
Article
Google Scholar
Wallis, K. F. (2014). Revisiting Francis Galton’s forecasting competition. Statistical Science, 29, 420–424.
Article
Google Scholar
Yi, S. K. M., Steyvers, M., Lee, M. D., & Dry, M. J. (2012). The wisdom of the crowd in combinatorial problems. Cognitive Science, 36, 452–470.
Article
Google Scholar