Addleman, D. A., Tao, J., Remington, R. W., & Jiang, Y. V. (2018). Explicit goal-driven attention, unlike implicitly learned attention, spreads to secondary tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(3), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000457
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Anderson, B. A. (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.3.7
Article
Google Scholar
Awh, E., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: A failed theoretical dichotomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(8), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.06.010
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Article
Google Scholar
Brascamp, J. W., Pels, E., & Kristjánsson, Á. (2011). Priming of pop-out on multiple time scales during visual search. Vision Research, 51(17), 1972–1978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2011.07.007
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Chauvel, G., Maquestiaux, F., Ruthruff, E., Didierjean, A., & Hartley, A. A. (2013). Novice motor performance: Better not to verbalize. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 177–183. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0331-x
Article
Google Scholar
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28–71. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Drew, T., Evans, K., Võ, M. L. H., Jacobson, F. L., & Wolfe, J. M. (2013). Informatics in radiology: What can you see in a single glance and how might this guide visual search in medical images? Radiographics, 33(1), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.331125023
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(4), 1030–1044. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
Article
Google Scholar
Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2002). Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science, 13(6), 520–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00491
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2005). Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(7), 1252–1268. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193557
Article
Google Scholar
Giménez-Fernández, T., Luque, D., Shanks, D. R., & Vadillo, M. A. (2020). Probabilistic cuing of visual search: Neither implicit nor inflexible. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(10), 1222–1234. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000852
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Giménez-Fernández, T., Luque, D., Shanks, D. R., & Vadillo, M. A. (2021). Is probabilistic cuing of visual search an inflexible attentional habit? A meta-analytic review. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xkcvm
Article
Google Scholar
Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394(6693), 575–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/29068
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. V. (2018). Habitual versus goal-driven attention. Cortex, 102, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.018
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. V., Koutstaal, W., & Twedell, E. L. (2016). Habitual attention in older and young adults. Psychology and Aging, 31(8), 970–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000139
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. V., Sha, L. Z., & Sisk, C. A. (2018). Experience-guided attention: Uniform and implicit. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 80(7), 1647–1653. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-018-1585-9
Article
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. V., & Sisk, C. A. (2019). Habit-like attention. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.014
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., & Capistrano, C. G. (2013a). Visual search and location probability learning from variable perspectives. Journal of Vision, 13(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1167/13.6.13
Article
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., Rosenbaum, G. M., & Herzig, C. (2013b). Rapid acquisition but slow extinction of an attentional bias in space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027611
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. V., Swallow, K. M., Won, B.-Y., Cistera, J. D., & Rosenbaum, G. M. (2015). Task specificity of attention training: The case of probability cuing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(1), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0747-7
Article
Google Scholar
Jiang, Y. V., Won, B.-Y., & Swallow, K. M. (2014). First saccadic eye movement reveals persistent attentional guidance by implicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(3), 1161–1173. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035961
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lee, S., Hong, I., & Jeong, S. K. (2020). Developmental invariance in the statistical learning of target location probability. The Korean Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 19–44. https://doi.org/10.35574/kjdp.2020.12.33.4.19
Article
Google Scholar
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1996). Priming of pop-out: II. The role of position. Perception & Psychophysics, 58(7), 977–991. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206826
Article
Google Scholar
Mitroff, S. R., & Biggs, A. T. (2014). The Ultra-Rare-Item Effect: Visual sarch for exceedingly rare items is highly susceptible to error. Psychological Science, 25(1), 284–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613504221
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., Macaskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Piras, A., Lobietti, R., & Squatrito, S. (2014). Response time, visual search strategy, and anticipatory skills in volleyball players. Journal of Ophthalmology, 2014, 189268. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/189268
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Shaqiri, A., & Anderson, B. (2012). Spatial probability cuing and right hemisphere damage. Brain and Cognition, 80(3), 352–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2012.08.006
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Shaqiri, A., & Anderson, B. (2013). Priming and statistical learning in right brain damaged patients. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2526–2533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.024
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sheridan, H., & Reingold, E. M. (2017). The holistic processing account of visual expertise in medical image perception: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(SEP), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01620
Article
Google Scholar
Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Aust, F., & Ben-Shachar, M. S. (2020). afex: Analysis of Factorial Experiments. http://afex.singmann.science/, https://github.com/singmann/afex
Sisk, C. A., Interrante, V., & Jiang, Y. V. (2021). Location probability learning in 3-dimensional virtual search environments. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00284-3
Article
Google Scholar
Sisk, C. A., Twedell, E. L., Koutstaal, W., Cooper, S. E., & Jiang, Y. V. (2018). Implicitly-learned spatial attention is unimpaired in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 119, 34–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.030
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smith, A. D., Hood, B. M., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2010). Probabilistic cuing in large-scale environmental search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(3), 605–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018280
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Vadillo, M. A., Linssen, D., Orgaz, C., Parsons, S., & Shanks, D. R. (2020). Unconscious or underpowered? Probabilistic cuing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(1), 160–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000632
Article
Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2017). Five factors that guide attention in visual search. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0058
Article
Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. M., Võ, M. L. H., Evans, K. K., & Greene, M. R. (2011). Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.001
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Won, B.-Y., & Jiang, Y. V. (2015). Spatial working memory interferes with explicit, but not probabilistic cuing of spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(3), 787–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000040
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Won, B.-Y., Lee, H. J., & Jiang, Y. V. (2015). Statistical learning modulates the direction of the first head movement in a large-scale search task. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(7), 2229–2239. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0957-7
Article
Google Scholar