Bainbridge, W. A., Pounder, Z., Eardley, A. F., & Baker, C. I. (2021). Quantifying aphantasia through drawing: Those without visual imagery show deficits in object but not spatial memory. Cortex, 135, 159–172.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bartlett, J. C., Searcy, J. H., & Abdi, H. (2003). What are the routes to face recognition. In G. Rhodes & M. A. Peterson (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytics and holistic processes (pp. 21–52). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Bindemann, M., & Hole, G. J. (2020). Understanding face identification through within-person variability in appearance: Introduction to a virtual special issue. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, NP1–NP8.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bruce, V., & Young, A. (2012). Recognizing faces. In Face perception (pp. 253–314). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Burton, A. M. (2013). Why has research in face recognition progressed so slowly? The importance of variability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1467–1485.
Article
Google Scholar
Carlson, C. A., Hemby, J. A., Wooten, A. R., Jones, A. R., Lockamyeir, R. F., Carlson, M. A., et al. (2021). Testing encoding specificity and the diagnostic feature-detection theory of eyewitness identification, with implications for showups, lineups, and partially disguised perpetrators. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6, 1–21.
Google Scholar
Carragher, D. J., & Hancock, P. J. (2020). Surgical face masks impair human face matching performance for familiar and unfamiliar faces. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, 1–15.
Google Scholar
Chan, J. C. K., O’Donnell, R., & Manley, K. D. (2021). Warning weakens retrieval-enhanced suggestibility only when it is given shortly after misinformation: the critical importance of timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied (in press).
Chua, E. F., Schacter, D. L., & Sperling, R. A. (2009). Neural correlates of metamemory: A comparison of feeling-of-knowing and retrospective confidence judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1751–1765.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Clark, S. E., & Tunnicliff, J. L. (2001). Selecting lineup foils in eyewitness identification experiments: Experimental control and real-world simulation. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 199–216.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cutler, B. L. (1988). Context reinstatement and eyewitness identification. In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 231–244). Wiley.
Google Scholar
Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1989). Forensically relevant moderators of the relation between eyewitness identification accuracy and confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 650–652.
Article
Google Scholar
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Dexter, H. R. (1990). Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 185–191.
Article
Google Scholar
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987a). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629–637.
Article
Google Scholar
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987b). The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 233–258.
Article
Google Scholar
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., O’Rourke, T. E., & Martens, T. K. (1986). Unconfounding the effects of contextual cues on eyewitness identification accuracy. Social Behaviour, 1, 113–134.
Google Scholar
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Stuve, T. E. (1988). Juror decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 41–55.
Article
Google Scholar
Dalton, P. (1993). The role of stimulus familiarity in context-dependent recognition. Memory & Cognition, 21, 223–234.
Article
Google Scholar
Davies, G. M., & Flin, R. (1984). The man behind the mask—disguise and face recognition. Human Learning, 3, 83–95.
Google Scholar
Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (2013). Four cornerstones of calibration research: Why understanding students’ judgments can improve their achievement. Learning and Instruction, 24, 58–61.
Article
Google Scholar
Dupuie, W. L., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Egeler, C. E., Warden, Respondent-appellee, 552 F.2d 704 (6th Cir. 1977).
Farah, M. J., Tanaka, J. W., & Drain, H. M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 628–634.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
Article
Google Scholar
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Sage.
Google Scholar
Fitousi, D., Rotschild, N., Pnini, C., & Azizi, O. (2021). Understanding the impact of face masks on the processing of facial identity, emotion, age, and gender. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–13.
Article
Google Scholar
Fleming, S. M., Massoni, S., Gajdos, T., & Vergnaud, J. C. (2016). Metacognition about the past and future: Quantifying common and distinct influences on prospective and retrospective judgments of self-performance. Neuroscience Consciousness, 2016, 1–12.
Article
Google Scholar
Foley, M. A., & Foley, H. J. (1998). A study of face identification: Are people looking beyond disguises? In D. L. Best & M. J. Intons-Peterson (Eds.), Memory distortions and their prevention (pp. 29–47). Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Freud, E., Stajduhar, A., Rosenbaum, R. S., Avidan, G., & Ganel, T. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic masks the way people perceive faces. Scientific Reports, 10, 1–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Gibling, F., & Davies, G. (1988). Reinstatement of context following exposure to post-event information. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 129–141.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Harris, A. M., & Aguirre, G. K. (2008). The effects of parts, wholes, and familiarity on face-selective responses in MEG. Journal of Vision, 8, 1–12.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hockley, W. E., Hemsworth, D. H., & Consoli, A. (1999). Shades of the mirror effect: Recognition of faces with and without sunglasses. Memory & Cognition, 27, 128–138.
Article
Google Scholar
Hole, G. J. (1994). Configurational factors in the perception of unfamiliar faces. Perception, 23, 65–74.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., White, D., Montfort, X. V., & Burton, A. M. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121, 313–323.
Article
Google Scholar
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Krafka, C., & Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 58–69.
Article
Google Scholar
Lampinen, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S., & Cling, A. D. (2012). The Psychology of Eyewitness Identification. Psychology Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Leder, H., & Carbon, C.-C. (2005). When context hinders! Learn–test compatibility in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 235–250.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Manley, K. D., Chan, J. C. K., & Wells, G. L. (2019). Do masked-face lineups facilitate eyewitness identification of a masked individual. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 25, 396–409.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mansour, J. K., Beaudry, J. L., Bertrand, M. I., Kalmet, N., Melsom, E. I., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2012). Impact of disguise on identification decisions and confidence with simultaneous and sequential lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 513–526.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255–260.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
McKone, E., Martini, P., & Nakayama, K. (2006). Isolating holistic processing in faces (and perhaps objects). In G. Rhodes & M. A. Peterson (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytics and holistic processes (pp. 92–119). Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 519–533.
Article
Google Scholar
Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & Behrmann, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 555–604.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When People’s Judgments of Learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: The “Delayed-JOL Effect.” Psychological Science, 2, 267–271.
Article
Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. B., Abed, E., & Pezdek, K. (2018). Postdictive confidence (but not predictive confidence) predicts eyewitness memory accuracy. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3, 1–13.
Google Scholar
Noble, A. (2013). Ski masks, a fashion accessory to crime in D.C.: Clearly are problem, but ban not feasible. Retrieved November 28, 2017. www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/30/ski-mask-is-fashion-accessory-to-crime-in-dc/
Noyes, E., & Jenkins, R. (2019). Deliberate disguise in face identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 25, 280–290.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Olsson, N., & Juslin, P. (1999). Can self-reported encoding strategy and recognition skill be diagnostic of performance in eyewitness identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 42–49.
Article
Google Scholar
Palmer, M. A., & Brewer, N. (2012). Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 247–255.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Palmer, M. A., Brewer, N., McKinnon, A. C., & Weber, N. (2010). Phenomenological reports diagnose accuracy of eyewitness identification decisions. Acta Psychologica, 133, 137–145.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Perfect, T. J. (2004). The role of self-rated ability in the accuracy of confidence judgements in eyewitness memory and general knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 157–168.
Article
Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. G., & Tauber, S. K. (2011). The influence of delaying judgments of learning on metacognitive accuracy: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 131–148.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Richler, J. J., Mack, M. L., Gauthier, I., & Palmeri, T. J. (2009). Holistic processing of faces happens at a glance. Vision Research, 49, 2856–2861.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Righi, G., Peissig, J. J., & Tarr, M. J. (2012). Recognizing disguised faces. Visual Cognition, 20, 143–169.
Article
Google Scholar
Russ, A. J., Sauerland, M., Lee, C. E., & Bindemann, M. (2018). Individual differences in eyewitness accuracy across multiple lineups of faces. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3, 1–17.
Google Scholar
Saraiva, R. B., Hope, L., Horselenberg, R., Ost, J., Sauer, J. D., & van Koppen, P. J. (2020). Using metamemory measures and memory tests to estimate eyewitness free recall performance. Memory, 28, 94–106.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Semmler, C., Dunn, J., Mickes, L., & Wixted, J. T. (2018). The role of estimator variables in eyewitness identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 24, 400–415.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139–156.
Article
Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 203–220.
Article
Google Scholar
Sommer, W., Heinz, A., Leuthold, H., Matt, J., & Schweinberger, S. R. (1995). Metamemory, distinctiveness, and event-related potentials in recognition memory for faces. Memory & Cognition, 23, 1–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2005). Judgments of learning: Evidence for a two-stage process. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1116–1129.
Article
Google Scholar
State v. Fierro, 489 P.2d 713, 107 Ariz. 479 (A. Z.1971).
State v. Courteau, 461 A.2d 1358 (R.I. 1983).
Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 225–245.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tanaka, J. W., & Sengco, J. A. (1997). Features and their configuration in face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 583–592.
Article
Google Scholar
Tanaka, J. W., & Simonyi, D. (2016). The “parts and wholes” of face recognition: A review of the literature. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 1876–1889.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Terry, R. L. (1994). Effects of facial transformations on accuracy of recognition. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 483–492.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
The White House. (2021). National strategy for the COVID-19 response and pandemic preparedness. The White House, https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/National-Strategy-for-the-COVID-19-Response-and-Pandemic-Preparedness.pdf.
Toseeb, U., Keeble, D. R., & Bryant, E. J. (2012). The significance of hair for face recognition. PLoS ONE, 7, 1–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.
Article
Google Scholar
Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546–1557.
Article
Google Scholar
Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification. American Psychologist, 48, 553–571.
Article
Google Scholar
Wells, G. L., Kovera, M. B., Douglass, A. B., Brewer, N., Meissner, C. A., & Wixted, J. T. (2020). Policy and procedure recommendations for the collection and preservation of eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 44, 3–36.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C., & Ferguson, T. J. (1979). Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 440–448.
Article
Google Scholar
Wilford, M. M., & Wells, G. L. (2010). Does facial processing prioritize change detection? Change blindness illustrates costs & benefits of holistic processing. Psychological Science, 21, 1611–1615.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Williams v. State 395 N.E.2d 239 Supreme court of Indiana No. 1278S281 (I.N. 1979).
Wixted, J. T., & Wells, G. L. (2017). The relationship between eyewitness confidence and identification accuracy: A new synthesis. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 18, 10–65.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141–145.
Article
Google Scholar
Young, A. W., Hellawell, D., & Hay, D. C. (1987). Configurational information in face perception. Perception, 16, 747–759.
Article
Google Scholar
Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Face perception: Domain specific, not process specific. Neuron, 44, 889–898.
PubMed
Google Scholar