Aarts, L., & Van Schagen, I. (2006). Driving speed and the risk of road crashes: A review. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(2), 215–224.
Google Scholar
Alario, F. X., Chainay, H., Lehericy, S., & Cohen, L. (2006). The role of the supplementary motor area (SMA) in word production. Brain Research, 1076(1), 129–143.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Allen, T. M., Lunenfeld, H., & Alexander, G. J. (1971). Driver information needs. Highway Research Record, 366(366), 102–115.
Google Scholar
Alm, H., & Nilsson, L. (1994). Changes in driver behaviour as a function of handsfree mobile phones—A simulator study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 26(4), 441–451.
Google Scholar
Almor, A. (2008). Why does language interfere with vision-based tasks? Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 260–268.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1036.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Auer, P. (2009). On-line syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences, 31(1), 1–13.
Google Scholar
Barthel, M., & Sauppe, S. (2019). Speech planning at turn transitions in dialog is associated with increased processing load. Cognitive Science, 43(7), e12768.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Barthel, M., Sauppe, S., Levinson, S. C., & Meyer, A. S. (2016). The timing of utterance planning in task-oriented dialogue: Evidence from a novel list-completion paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1858.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package Version, 1(7), 1–23.
Google Scholar
Becic, E., Dell, G. S., Bock, K., Garnsey, S. M., Kubose, T., & Kramer, F. (2010). Driving impairs talking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 15–21.
Google Scholar
Beede, K. E., & Kass, S. J. (2006). Engrossed in conversation: The impact of cell phones on simulated driving performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38(2), 415–421.
Google Scholar
Bergen, B., Medeiros-Ward, N., Wheeler, K., Drews, F., & Strayer, D. (2013). The crosstalk hypothesis: Why language interferes with driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(1), 119.
Google Scholar
Bock, K. (1996). Language production: Methods and methodologies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 395–421.
Google Scholar
Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Garnsey, S. M., Kramer, A. F., & Kubose, T. T. (2007). Car talk, car listen. Automaticity and Control in Language Processing, 1, 21–42.
Google Scholar
Boiteau, T. W., Malone, P. S., Peters, S. A., & Almor, A. (2014). Interference between conversation and a concurrent visuo-motor task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 295.
Google Scholar
Boland, J. E. (2004). Linking eye movements to sentence comprehension in reading and listening. The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP, and beyond, 51–76.
Borst, J. P., & Taatgen, N. A. (2007). The costs of multitasking in threaded cognition. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on cognitive modeling (pp. 133–138).
Borst, J. P., Taatgen, N. A., & Van Rijn, H. (2010). The problem state: A cognitive bottleneck in multitasking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(2), 363.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Boyle, L. N., & Lee, J. D. (2010). Using driving simulators to assess driving safety.
Brackstone, M., & McDonald, M. (2007). Driver headway: How close is too close on a motorway? Ergonomics, 50(8), 1183–1195.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. Pergamon Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/10037-000
Book
Google Scholar
Bruck, L., Haycock, B., & Emadi, A. (2020). A review of driving simulation technology and applications. IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology.
Caird, J. K., Johnston, K. A., Willness, C. R., & Asbridge, M. (2014a). The use of meta-analysis or research synthesis to combine driving simulation or naturalistic study results on driver distraction. Journal of Safety Research, 49, 91-e1.
Google Scholar
Caird, J. K., Johnston, K. A., Willness, C. R., Asbridge, M., & Steel, P. (2014b). A meta-analysis of the effects of texting on driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 71, 311–318.
Google Scholar
Caird, J. K., Simmons, S. M., Wiley, K., Johnston, K. A., & Horrey, W. J. (2018). Does talking on a cell phone, with a passenger, or dialing affect driving performance? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human Factors, 60(1), 101–133.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 77–94.
Google Scholar
Christodoulides, G. (2016). Effects of cognitive load on speech production and perception. Doctoral dissertation, UCL-Université Catholique de Louvain.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. (2006). Do writing and speaking employ the same syntactic representations? Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 185–198.
Google Scholar
Conners, F. A. (2009). Attentional control and the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 22(5), 591–613.
Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Strayer, D. L. (2013). The impact of eye movements and cognitive workload on lateral position variability in driving. Human Factors, 55(5), 1001–1014.
PubMed
Google Scholar
da Silva, F. P. (2014). Mental workload, task demand and driving performance: What relation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 162, 310–319.
Google Scholar
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(4), 450–466.
Google Scholar
Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Demberg, V., Sayeed, A., Mahr, A., & Müller, C. (2013, October). Measuring linguistically-induced cognitive load during driving using the ConTRe task. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (pp. 176–183).
Demberg, V. (2013). Pupillometry: The index of cognitive activity in a dual-task study. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society (Vol. 35, No. 35).
Demberg, V., & Sayeed, A. (2016). The frequency of rapid pupil dilations as a measure of linguistic processing difficulty. PLoS ONE, 11(1), e0146194.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70(1), 80.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Diehl, R. L., Lotto, A. J., & Holt, L. L. (2004). Speech perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 149–179.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Dogan, E., Steg, L., & Delhomme, P. (2011). The influence of multiple goals on driving behavior: The case of safety, time saving, and fuel saving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(5), 1635–1643.
Google Scholar
Emerson, M. J., & Miyake, A. (2003). The role of inner speech in task switching: A dual-task investigation. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 148–168.
Google Scholar
Engström, J. (2011). Understanding attention selection in driving: From limited capa city to adaptive behaviour. Chalmers University of Technology.
Engström, J., Markkula, G., Victor, T., & Merat, N. (2017). Effects of cognitive load on driving performance: The cognitive control hypothesis. Human Factors, 59(5), 734–764.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., Engelhardt, P. E., & Jones, M. W. (2009). Good enough language processing: A satisficing approach. In Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the cognitive science society. Austin: Cognitive Science Society.
Ferreira, F., & Lowder, M. W. (2016). Prediction, information structure, and good-enough language processing. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 65, pp. 217–247). Academic Press.
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(6), 725–745.
Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Linearization strategies during language production. Memory & Cognition, 26(1), 88–96.
Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Patson, N. D. (2007). The ‘good enough’ approach to language comprehension. Language and Linguistics Compass, 1(1–2), 71–83.
Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Swets, B. (2002). How incremental is language production? Evidence from the production of utterances requiring the computation of arithmetic sums. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(1), 57–84.
Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S. (2010). Language production. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(6), 834–844.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S. (2019). A mechanistic framework for explaining audience design in language production. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 29–51.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(6), 1187.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fuller, R. (2005). Towards a general theory of driver behaviour. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37(3), 461–472.
Google Scholar
Funk, M., Tobisch, V., & Emfield, A. (2020, April). Non-verbal auditory input for controlling binary, discrete, and continuous input in automotive user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–13).
Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K. (2016). Investigating conversational dynamics: Interactive alignment, Interpersonal synergy, and collective task performance. Cognitive Science, 40(1), 145–171.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2009). Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 292–304.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R., January, D., Nappa, R., & Trueswell, J. C. (2007). On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(4), 544–569.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Gravano, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2012). A corpus-based study of interruptions in spoken dialogue. In Thirteenth annual conference of the international speech communication association.
Griffin, Z. M., & Bock, K. (2000). What the eyes say about speaking. Psychological Science, 11(4), 274–279.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gullberg, K. (2020). Planning processes in speaking, texting, and writing—The effect of reader’s and listener’s temporal and spatial presence on planning in language production.
Guo, F. (2019). Statistical methods for naturalistic driving studies. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 6, 309–328.
Google Scholar
Hauk, O., Shtyrov, Y., & Pulvermüller, F. (2008). The time course of action and action-word comprehension in the human brain as revealed by neurophysiology. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102(1–3), 50–58.
Google Scholar
Häuser, K. I., Demberg, V., & Kray, J. (2019). Effects of aging and dual-task demands on the comprehension of less expected sentence continuations: Evidence from pupillometry. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 709.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (2012). Modeling and remodeling writing. Written Communication, 29(3), 369–388.
Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R., & Chenoweth, N. A. (2006). Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts? Written Communication, 23(2), 135–149.
Google Scholar
He, J., Chaparro, A., Wu, X., Crandall, J., & Ellis, J. (2015). Mutual interferences of driving and texting performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 115–123.
Google Scholar
Heldner, M., & Edlund, J. (2010). Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations. Journal of Phonetics, 38(4), 555–568.
Google Scholar
Henderson, J. M. (2017). Gaze control as prediction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(1), 15–23.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Henderson, J. M., Malcolm, G. L., & Schandl, C. (2009). Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 850–856.
Google Scholar
Hoey, E. M., & Kendrick, K. H. (2017). Conversation analysis. Research methods in psycholinguistics: A practical guide, 151–173.
Hollnagel, E., Nåbo, A., & Lau, I. V. (2003). A systemic model for driver-in-control.
Horrey, W. J., Wickens, C. D., & Consalus, K. P. (2006). Modeling drivers’ visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12(2), 67.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Horton, W. S., & Gerrig, R. J. (2005). The impact of memory demands on audience design during language production. Cognition, 96(2), 127–142.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Jobard, G., Vigneau, M., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2007). Impact of modality and linguistic complexity during reading and listening tasks. NeuroImage, 34(2), 784–800.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kaplan, S., & Prato, C. G. (2012). Associating crash avoidance maneuvers with driver attributes and accident characteristics: A mixed logit model approach. Traffic Injury Prevention, 13(3), 315–326.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35(3), 211–223.
Google Scholar
Kieras, D. E., Meyer, D. E., Ballas, J. A., & Lauber, E. J. (2000). Modern computational perspectives on executive mental processes and cognitive control: Where to from here. Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII, 681–712.
Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking—An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 557.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kubose, T. T., Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Garnsey, S. M., Kramer, A. F., & Mayhugh, J. (2006). The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology: THe Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 20(1), 43–63.
Google Scholar
Laberge, J., Scialfa, C., White, C., & Caird, J. (2004). Effects of passenger and cellular phone conversations on driver distraction. Transportation Research Record, 1899(1), 109–116.
Google Scholar
Laganaro, M., Valente, A., & Perret, C. (2012). Time course of word production in fast and slow speakers: A high density ERP topographic study. NeuroImage, 59(4), 3881–3888.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lavie, N., Hirst, A., De Fockert, J. W., & Viding, E. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 339.
Google Scholar
Lawrence, M. A., & Lawrence, M. M. A. (2016). Package ‘ez’.
Lee, A., Cerisano, S., Humphreys, K. R., & Watter, S. (2017). Talking is harder than listening: The time course of dual-task costs during naturalistic conversation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 71(2), 111.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lee, E. K., Brown-Schmidt, S., & Watson, D. G. (2013). Ways of looking ahead: Hierarchical planning in language production. Cognition, 129(3), 544–562.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Lee, Y. C., Lee, J. D., & Ng Boyle, L. (2009). The interaction of cognitive load and attention-directing cues in driving. Human Factors, 51(3), 271–280.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. (1982). Linearization in describing spatial networks. In Processes, beliefs, and questions (pp. 199–220). Springer.
Levelt, W. J. (1981). The speaker’s linearization problem. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences, 295(1077), 305–315.
Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6), 223–232.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Science, 22, 1–75.
Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2016). Turn-taking in human communication–origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(1), 6–14.
Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015). Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 731.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Linardoua, M., Spyropouloua, I., Pavloub, D., & Yannisb, G. (2018). Impact of mobile phone use on driving performance: Findings from a simulator study. In Proceedings of 7th transport research arena TRA, Vienna, Austria.
Liu, Y., & Wickens, C. D. (1989, October). Visual scanning with or without spatial uncertainty and time-sharing performance. In Proceedings of the human factors society annual meeting (Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 76–80). SAGE Publications.
Long, J. D. (2012). Longitudinal data analysis for the behavioral sciences using R. Sage.
Google Scholar
Lovett, M. C., Daily, L. Z., & Reder, L. M. (2000). A source activation theory of working memory: Cross-task prediction of performance in ACT-R. Cognitive Systems Research, 1(2), 99–118.
Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 226.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C. (2016). Speak, act, remember: The language-production basis of serial order and maintenance in verbal memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 47–53.
Google Scholar
MacDonald, M. C., & Hsiao, Y. (2018). Sentence comprehension (Vol. 2). Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Mackay, D. G. (1973). Aspects of the theory of comprehension, memory and attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25(1), 22–40.
Google Scholar
Mahr, A., Feld, M., Moniri, M. M., & Math, R. (2012). The contre (continuous tracking and reaction) task: A flexible approach for assessing driver cognitive workload with high sensitivity. Automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, 88–91.
Marti, S., Sigman, M., & Dehaene, S. (2012). A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period. NeuroImage, 59(3), 2883–2898.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Math, R., Mahr, A., Moniri, M. M., & Müller, C. (2012, October). OpenDS: A new open-source driving simulator for research. In Adjunct proceedings of the 4th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, Portsmouth, NH, USA (pp. 7–8).
Mathew, J., Masson, G. S., & Danion, F. R. (2020). Sex differences in visuomotor tracking. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–12.
Google Scholar
Metz, B., Schömig, N., & Krüger, H. P. (2011). Attention during visual secondary tasks in driving: Adaptation to the demands of the driving task. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(5), 369–380.
Google Scholar
Meyer, D. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1997). A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple-task performance: Part I. Basic mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104(1), 3.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Michon, J. A. (1985). A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do? In Human behavior and traffic safety (pp. 485–524). Springer.
Murphy, G., & Greene, C. M. (2017). Load theory behind the wheel; perceptual and cognitive load effects. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 71(3), 191.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Murray, S. O., Schallmo, M. P., Kolodny, T., Millin, R., Kale, A., Thomas, P., Rammsayer, T. H., Troche, S. J., Bernier, R. A., & Tadin, D. (2018). Sex differences in visual motion processing. Current Biology, 28(17), 2794–2799.
PubMed
Google Scholar
National Center for Statistics and Analysis. (2021, April). Distracted driving 2019 (Research Note. Report No. DOT HS 813 111). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Nozari, N., & Novick, J. (2017). Monitoring and control in language production. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(5), 403–410.
Google Scholar
Olive, T., Kellog, R., & Piolat, A. (2008). Verbal, visual, and spatial working memory demands during text composition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29(4), 669.
Google Scholar
Parodi, G. (2007). Reading–writing connections: Discourse-oriented research. Reading and Writing, 20(3), 225–250.
Google Scholar
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Perrone-Bertolotti, M., Rapin, L., Lachaux, J. P., Baciu, M., & Loevenbruck, H. (2014). What is that little voice inside my head? Inner speech phenomenology, its role in cognitive performance, and its relation to self-monitoring. Behavioural Brain Research, 261, 220–239.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013). An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 329–347.
Google Scholar
Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77(2), 97–132.
PubMed
Google Scholar
R Studio Team. (2016). RStudio: Integrated development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/.
Rajan, R., Selker, T., & Lane, I. (2016, March). Task load estimation and mediation using psycho-physiological measures. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on intelligent user interfaces (pp. 48–59).
Rapp, D. N., & Van Den Broek, P. (2005). Dynamic text comprehension: An integrative view of reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 276–279.
Google Scholar
Rayner, K., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2009). Language processing in reading and speech perception is fast and incremental: Implications for event-related potential research. Biological Psychology, 80(1), 4–9.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Recarte, M. A., & Nunes, L. M. (2003). Mental workload while driving: Effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(2), 119.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Regan, M. A., Hallett, C., & Gordon, C. P. (2011). Driver distraction and driver inattention: Definition, relationship and taxonomy. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(5), 1771–1781.
Google Scholar
Reichel, S., Sohn, J., Ehrlich, U., Berton, A., & Weber, M. (2014, June). Out-of-domain spoken dialogs in the car: A WoZ study. In Proceedings of the 15th annual meeting of the special interest group on discourse and dialogue (SIGDIAL) (pp. 12–21).
Roelofs, A., Özdemir, R., & Levelt, W. J. (2007). Influences of spoken word planning on speech recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(5), 900.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2011). Attention demands of spoken word planning: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 307.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Salvucci, D. D., Taatgen, N. A., & Borst, J. P. (2009, April). Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: From concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1819–1828).
Salvucci, D. D. (2001). An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding. Cognitive Systems Research, 1(4), 201–220.
Google Scholar
Salvucci, D. D. (2005). A multitasking general executive for compound continuous tasks. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 457–492.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Salvucci, D. D. (2006). Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Human Factors, 48(2), 362–380.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Salvucci, D. D., & Beltowska, J. (2008). Effects of memory rehearsal on driver performance: Experiment and theoretical account. Human Factors, 50(5), 834–844.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Salvucci, D. D., Boer, E. R., & Liu, A. (2001). Toward an integrated model of driver behavior in cognitive architecture. Transportation Research Record, 1779(1), 9–16.
Google Scholar
Salvucci, D. D., & Gray, R. (2004). A two-point visual control model of steering. Perception, 33(10), 1233–1248.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Salvucci, D. D., & Taatgen, N. A. (2008). Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115(1), 101.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Schaeffner, S., Koch, I., & Philipp, A. M. (2016). The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 80(2), 212–223.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (2001). Constraint satisfaction in language acquisition and processing. Connectionist Psycholinguistics, 281–318.
Silveri, M. C., & Misciagna, S. (2000). Language, memory, and the cerebellum. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 13(2–3), 129–143.
Google Scholar
Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., & Aust, F. (2015). afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. R package version 0.13-145.
Sjerps, M. J., & Meyer, A. S. (2015). Variation in dual-task performance reveals late initiation of speech planning in turn-taking. Cognition, 136, 304–324.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Stoet, G. (2017). Sex differences in the Simon task help to interpret sex differences in selective attention. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 81(3), 571.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Biondi, F., & Cooper, J. M. (2017). Dynamic workload fluctuations in driver/non-driver conversational dyads. In D. V. McGehee, J. D. Lee, & M. Rizzo (Eds.), Driving assessment 2017: International symposium on human factors in driver assessment, training, and vehicle design (pp. 362–367). Published by the Public Policy Center, University of Iowa.
Strayer, D. L., & Cooper, J. M. (2015). Driven to distraction. Human Factors, 57(8), 1343–1347.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Cooper, J. M., Turrill, J., Coleman, J. R., & Hopman, R. J. (2017). The smartphone and the driver’s cognitive workload: A comparison of Apple, Google, and Microsoft’s intelligent personal assistants. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/revue Canadienne De Psychologie Expérimentale, 71(2), 93.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., & Drews, F. A. (2007). Cell-phone induced inattention blindness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 128–131.
Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9(1), 23.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., & Fisher, D. L. (2016). SPIDER: A framework for understanding driver distraction. Human Factors, 58(1), 5–12.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science, 12(6), 462–466.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Turrill, J., Cooper, J. M., Coleman, J., Medeiros-Ward, N., & Biondi, F. (2015). Assessing cognitive distraction in the automobile. Human Factors, 53, 1300–1324.
Google Scholar
Swets, B., Jacovina, M. E., & Gerrig, R. J. (2014). Individual differences in the scope of speech planning: Evidence from eye-movements. Language and Cognition, 6(1), 12–44.
Google Scholar
Treisman, A. (1964). Monitoring and storage of irrelevant messages in selective attention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3(6), 449–459.
Google Scholar
Underwood, G., Crundall, D., & Chapman, P. (2011). Driving simulator validation with hazard perception. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14(6), 435–446.
Google Scholar
Vogels, J., Demberg, V., & Kray, J. (2018). The index of cognitive activity as a measure of cognitive processing load in dual task settings. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2276.
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Vogels, J., Howcroft, D. M., Tourtouri, E., & Demberg, V. (2020). How speakers adapt object descriptions to listeners under load. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(1), 78–92.
Google Scholar
Watson, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2010). Supertaskers: Profiles in extraordinary multitasking ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(4), 479–485.
Google Scholar
Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159–177.
Google Scholar
Wickens, C. D. (2008). Multiple resources and mental workload. Human Factors, 50(3), 449–455.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wijayaratna, K. P., Cunningham, M. L., Regan, M. A., Jian, S., Chand, S., & Dixit, V. V. (2019). Mobile phone conversation distraction: Understanding differences in impact between simulator and naturalistic driving studies. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 129, 108–118.
Google Scholar
Young, K., Regan, M., & Hammer, M. (2007). Driver distraction: A review of the literature. Distracted Driving, 2007, 379–405.
Google Scholar
Yuan, J., Liberman, M., & Cieri, C. (2007). Towards an integrated understanding of speech overlaps in conversation. ICPhS XVI, Saarbrücken, Germany.