Akaike, H. (1973). Information theory and an extension of maximum likelihood principle. In B. N. Petrov & F. Csaki (Eds.), *Second international symposium on information theory* (pp. 267–281). Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.

Google Scholar

Bachrach, Y., Graepel, T., Kasneci, G., Kosinski, M., & Van Gael, J. (2012). Crowd IQ: Aggregating opinions to boost performance. In *Proceedings of the 11th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems* (Vol. 1, pp. 535–542).

Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Latham, P. E., Roepstorff, A., Rees, G., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Optimally interacting minds. *Science*, *329*(5995), 1081–1085.

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Bang, D., & Frith, C. D. (2017). Making better decisions in groups. *Royal Society Open Science*, *4*(8), 170193.

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Bang, D., Fusaroli, R., Tylén, K., Olsen, K., Latham, P. E., Lau, J. Y., et al. (2014). Does interaction matter? Testing whether a confidence heuristic can replace interaction in collective decision-making. *Consciousness and Cognition*, *26*, 13–23.

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Birnbaum, M. H., & Diecidue, E. (2015). Testing a class of models that includes majority rule and regret theories: Transitivity, recycling, and restricted branch independence. *Decision*, *2*(3), 145.

Article
Google Scholar

Brenner, L. A., Koehler, D. J., Liberman, V., & Tversky, A. (1996). Overconfidence in probability and frequency judgments: A critical examination. *Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes*, *65*(3), 212–219.

Article
Google Scholar

Dienes, Z., & Seth, A. (2010). Gambling on the unconscious: A comparison of wagering and confidence ratings as measures of awareness in an artificial grammar task. *Consciousness and Cognition*, *19*(2), 674–681.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2018). *Computational modeling of cognition and behavior*. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Book
Google Scholar

Fiedler, K., & Krueger, J. I. (2012). More than an artifact: Regression as a theoretical construct. In J. I. Krueger (Ed.), *Social judgment and decision making* (pp. 171–189). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

Google Scholar

Fleming, S. M., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2012). Metacognition: Computation, biology and function. *Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences*, *367*(1594), 1280–1286.

Article
Google Scholar

Forstmann, B. U., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Eichele, T., Brown, S., & Serences, J. T. (2011). Reciprocal relations between cognitive neuroscience and formal cognitive models: Opposites attract? *Trends in Cognitive Sciences*, *15*(6), 272–279.

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Galesic, M., Barkoczi, D., & Katsikopoulos, K. (2018). Smaller crowds outperform larger crowds and individuals in realistic task conditions. *Decision*, *5*(1), 1.

Article
Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G. (2018). The bias bias in behavioral economics. *Review of Behavioral Economics*, *5*(3–4), 303–336.

Article
Google Scholar

Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. *Psychological Review*, *98*(4), 506.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Griffin, D., & Brenner, L. (2004). Perspectives on probability judgment calibration. *Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making*, *199*, 158–177.

Google Scholar

Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992). The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. *Cognitive Psychology*, *24*(3), 411–435.

Article
Google Scholar

Grofman, B., Owen, G., & Feld, S. L. (1983). Thirteen theorems in search of the truth. *Theory and Decision*, *15*(3), 261–278.

Article
Google Scholar

Hastie, R., & Kameda, T. (2005). The robust beauty of majority rules in group decisions. *Psychological Review*, *112*(2), 494–508.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Hautz, W. E., Kämmer, J. E., Schauber, S. K., Spies, C. D., & Gaissmaier, W. (2015). Diagnostic performance by medical students working individually or in teams. *Journal of the American Medical Association*, *313*, 303–304.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Kaniovski, S., & Zaigraev, A. (2011). Optimal jury design for homogeneous juries with correlated votes. *Theory and Decision*, *71*(4), 439–459.

Article
Google Scholar

Klein, N., & Epley, N. (2015). Group discussion improves lie detection. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, *112*(24), 7460–7465.

Article
Google Scholar

Koriat, A. (2012a). The self-consistency model of subjective confidence. *Psychological Review*, *119*(1), 80.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Koriat, A. (2012b). When are two heads better than one and why? *Science*, *336*(6079), 360–362.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Koriat, A. (2015). When two heads are better than one and when they can be worse: The amplification hypothesis. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: General*, *144*(5), 934.

Article
Google Scholar

Koriat, A. (2017). Can people identify “deceptive” or “misleading” items that tend to produce mostly wrong answers? *Journal of Behavioral Decision Making*, *30*(5), 1066–1077.

Article
Google Scholar

Kosinski, M., Bachrach, Y., Kasneci, G., Van-Gael, J., & Graepel, T. (2012). Crowd IQ: Measuring the intelligence of crowdsourcing platforms. In *Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM web science conference* (pp. 151–160).

Kurvers, R. H., Herzog, S. M., Hertwig, R., Krause, J., Carney, P. A., Bogart, A., et al. (2016). Boosting medical diagnostics by pooling independent judgments. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, *113*(31), 8777–8782.

Article
Google Scholar

Le Mens, G., & Denrell, J. (2011). Rational learning and information sampling: On the “naivety” assumption in sampling explanations of judgment biases. *Psychological Review*, *118*(2), 379.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Litvinova, A., Herzog, S. M., Kall, A. A., Pleskac, T. J., & Hertwig, R. (2020). How the “wisdom of the inner crowd” can boost accuracy of confidence judgments. *Decision*,. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ngweh.

Article
Google Scholar

Litvinova, A., Kurvers, R. H., Hertwig, R., & Herzog, S. M. (2019). *When experts make inconsistent decisions*. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dtaz3.

Mahmoodi, A., Bang, D., Olsen, K., Zhao, Y. A., Shi, Z., Broberg, K., et al. (2015). Equality bias impairs collective decision-making across cultures. *Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences*, *112*(12), 3835–3840.

Article
Google Scholar

Mannes, A. E., Soll, J. B., & Larrick, R. P. (2014). The wisdom of select crowds. *Journal of Personality and Social Psychology*, *107*(2), 276.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Marshall, J. A., Brown, G., & Radford, A. N. (2017). Individual confidence-weighting and group decision-making. *Trends in Ecology and Evolution*, *32*(9), 636–645.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Martins, A. C. (2006). Probability biases as Bayesian inference. *Judgment and Decision Making*, *1*(2), 108.

Article
Google Scholar

Massoni, S., Gajdos, T., & Vergnaud, J.-C. (2014). Confidence measurement in the light of signal detection theory. *Frontiers in Psychology*, *5*, 1455.

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Mercier, H. (2016). The argumentative theory: Predictions and empirical evidence. *Trends in Cognitive Sciences*, *20*(9), 689–700.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Moore, D. A., & Healy, P. J. (2008). The trouble with overconfidence. *Psychological Review*, *115*(2), 502.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Neth, H., Sims, C. R., & Gray, W. D. (2016). Rational task analysis: A methodology to benchmark bounded rationality. *Minds and Machines*, *26*(1–2), 125–148.

Article
Google Scholar

Nitzan, S., & Paroush, J. (1982). Optimal decision rules in uncertain dichotomous choice situations. *International Economic Review*, *23*(2), 289–297.

Article
Google Scholar

Olsson, H. (2014). Measuring overconfidence: Methodological problems and statistical artifacts. *Journal of Business Research*, *67*(8), 1766–1770.

Article
Google Scholar

Pouget, A., Drugowitsch, J., & Kepecs, A. (2016). Confidence and certainty: Distinct probabilistic quantities for different goals. *Nature Neuroscience*, *19*(3), 366.

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Puncochar, J. M., & Fox, P. W. (2004). Confidence in individual and group decision making: When “two heads” are worse than one. *Journal of Educational Psychology*, *96*(3), 582.

Article
Google Scholar

Regenwetter, M., Davis-Stober, C. P., Lim, S. H., Guo, Y., Popova, A., Zwilling, C., et al. (2014). QTest: Quantitative testing of theories of binary choice. *Decision*, *1*(1), 2.

Article
Google Scholar

Schwarz, G., et al. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. *The Annals of Statistics*, *6*(2), 461–464.

Article
Google Scholar

Shapley, L., & Grofman, B. (1984). Optimizing group judgmental accuracy in the presence of interdependencies. *Public Choice*, *43*(3), 329–343.

Article
Google Scholar

Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. (1989). Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. *Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes*, *43*(1), 1–28.

Article
Google Scholar

Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. (1990). Revision, weighting, and commitment in consensus group judgment. *Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes*, *45*(1), 66–84.

Article
Google Scholar

Sorkin, R. D., Hays, C. J., & West, R. (2001). Signal-detection analysis of group decision making. *Psychological Review*, *108*(1), 183.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Stasser, G., & Abele, S. (2020). Collective choice, collaboration, and communication. *Annual Review of Psychology*, *71*, 589–612.

Article
PubMed
Google Scholar

Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. *Journal of Personality and Social Psychology*, *53*(1), 81.

Article
Google Scholar

Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (2003). Hidden profiles: A brief history. *Psychological Inquiry*, *14*(3–4), 304–313.

Article
Google Scholar

van Dijk, F., Sonnemans, J., & Bauw, E. (2014). Judicial error by groups and individuals. *Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization*, *108*, 224–235.

Article
Google Scholar

Vercammen, A., Ji, Y., & Burgman, M. (2019). The collective intelligence of random small crowds: A partial replication of Kosinski et al. (2012). *Judgment and Decision Making*, *14*(1), 91.

Article
Google Scholar

Wilson, R. C., & Collins, A. G. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. *Elife*, *8*, e49547.

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Windschitl, P. D., & Wells, G. L. (1996). Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verbal versus numeric methods. *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied*, *2*(4), 343.

Google Scholar

Wolf, M., Krause, J., Carney, P. A., Bogart, A., & Kurvers, R. H. (2015). Collective intelligence meets medical decision-making: The collective outperforms the best radiologist. *PLoS ONE*, *10*(8), e0134269.

Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar

Zehetleitner, M., & Rausch, M. (2013). Being confident without seeing: What subjective measures of visual consciousness are about. *Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics*, *75*(7), 1406–1426.

Article
Google Scholar