Arts, A., Maes, A., Noordman, L. G. M., & Jansen, C. (2011). Overspecification facilitates object identification. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 361–374.
Article
Google Scholar
Bahle, B., Matsukura, M., & Hollingworth, A. (2019). Contrasting gist-based and template-based guidance during real-world visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 44(3), 367–386.
Google Scholar
Belke, E., & Meyer, A. (2002). Tracking the time course of multidimensional stimulus discrimination: Analyses of viewing patterns and processing times during “same”-"different" decisions. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14(2), 237–266.
Article
Google Scholar
Boettcher, S. E. P., Draschkow, D., Dienhart, E., & Võ, L.-H. M. (2018). Anchoring visual search in scenes: Assessing the role of anchor objects on eye movements during visual search. Journal of Vision, 18(13):11, 1–13.
Bravo, M. J. & Farid, H. (2009). The specificity of the search template. Journal of Vision, 9(1):34, 1–9.
Bürkner, P. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1), 1–28.
Article
Google Scholar
Bürkner, P. (2018). Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal, 10(1), 395–411.
Article
Google Scholar
Castelhano, M. S., & Heaven, C. (2010). The relative contribution of scene context and target features to visual search in scenes. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72(5), 1283–1297.
Article
Google Scholar
Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(4), 753–763.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Castelhano, M. S., Pollatsek, A., & Cave, K. R. (2008). Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(4), 795–801.
Article
Google Scholar
Clark, H. H., & Murphy, G. L. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. Advances in Psychology, 9, 287–299.
Article
Google Scholar
Davies, C., & Katsos, N. (2013). Are speakers and listeners only moderately Gricean? An empirical response to Engelhardt et al. (2006). Journal of Pragmatics, 49, 78–106.
Degen, J., Hawkins, R. D., Graf, C., Kreiss, E., & Goodman, N. D. (2020). When redundancy is useful: A Bayesian approach to “overinformative” referring expressions. Psychological Review, 127(4), 591–621.
Article
Google Scholar
Engelhardt, P. E., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Do speakers and listeners observe the Gricean Maxim of Quantity? Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 554–573.
Article
Google Scholar
Engelhardt, P. E., Demiral, ŞB., & Ferreira, F. (2011). Over-specified referring expressions impair comprehension: An ERP study. Brain and Cognition, 77, 304–314.
Article
Google Scholar
Engelhardt, P. E., & Ferreira, F. (2016). Reaching sentence and reference meaning. In P. Knoeferle, P. Pyykkönen-Klauck, &M. W. Crocker (Eds.), Visually situated language comprehension, 93, 127. Advances in Consciousness Research. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive psychology, 47(2), 164–203.
Article
Google Scholar
Gatt, A., Krahmer, E., van Deemter, K., & van Gompel, R. P. (2017). Reference production as search: The impact of domain size on the production of distinguishing descriptions. Cognitive Science, 41, 1457–1492.
Article
Google Scholar
Gatt, A., van Gompel, R. P., Krahmer, E., & van Deemter, K. (2011). Non-deterministic attribute selection in reference production. In Proceedings of the workshop on production of referring expressions: Bridging the gap between empirical, computational and psycholinguistic approaches to reference (pre-cogsci’11). Boston, MA.
Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Piantadosi, S. T., Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L., & Levy, R. (2019). How efficiency shapes human language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(5), 389–407.
Article
Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Henderson, J. M., & Hayes, T. R. (2017). Meaning-based guidance of attention in scenes as revealed by meaning maps. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(10), 743.
Article
Google Scholar
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (2004). Scene perception for psycholinguists. In J. M.Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision, and action: Eyemovements and the visual world (pp. 1–58). Psychology Press.
Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2015). Target templates: The precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 77, 128–149.
Article
Google Scholar
Hout, M. C., Robbins, A., Godwin, H. J., Fitzsimmons, G., & Scarince, C. (2017). Categorical templates are more useful when features are consistent: Evidence from eye movements during search for societally important vehicles. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 79, 1578–1592.
Article
Google Scholar
Konopka, A. E., & Brown-Schmidt, S. (2014). Message encoding. In M. Goldrick, V. Ferreira, & M. Miozzo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language production (pp. 3–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Koolen, R., Goudbeek, M., & Krahmer, E. (2013). The effect of scene variation on the redundant use of color in definite reference. Cognitive Science, 37, 395–411.
Article
Google Scholar
Lupyan, G., & Spivey, M. J. (2010). Redundant spoken labels facilitate perception of multiple items. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 72(8), 2236–2253.
Article
Google Scholar
Malcolm, G. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Vision, 9(11), 8.
Article
Google Scholar
Malcolm, G. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search. Journal of Vision, 10(2), 4.
Article
Google Scholar
Maxfield, J. T., Stalder, W. D., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2014). Effects of target typicality on categorical search. Journal of Vision, 14(12), 1–11.
Article
Google Scholar
Mitchell, M., Reiter, E., & van Deemter, K. (2013). Typicality and object reference. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 35(35), 3062–3067.
Google Scholar
Nicenboim, B., & Vasishth, S. (2016). Statistical methods for linguistic research: Foundational Ideas—Part II. Language and Linguistics Compass, 10, 591–613.
Article
Google Scholar
Pechmann, T. (1989). Incremental speech production and referential overspecification. Linguistics, 27(1), 89–110.
Article
Google Scholar
Rao, R. P., Zelinsky, G. J., Hayhoe, M. M., & Ballard, D. H. (2002). Eye movements in iconic visual search. Vision Research., 42(11), 1447–63.
Article
Google Scholar
Reeder, R. R., & Peelen, M. V. (2013). The contents of the search template for category-level search in natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 13.
Article
Google Scholar
Rubio-Fernández, P. (2016). How redundant are color adjectives? An efficiency-based analysis of color overspecification. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 153.
Article
Google Scholar
Sareen, P., Ehinger, K. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (2015). CB database: A change blindness database for objects in natural indoor scenes. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1343–1348.
Article
Google Scholar
Schmidt, J., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2009). Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(10), 1904–1914.
Article
Google Scholar
Sedivy, J. C. (2003). Pragmatic versus form-based accounts of referential contrast: Evidence for effects of informativity expectations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 3–23.
Article
Google Scholar
Spivey, M. J., Tyler, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2001). Linguistically mediated visual search. Psychological Science, 12(4), 282–287.
Article
Google Scholar
SR Research (2017). EyeLink 1000 plus user manual, version 1.0.2. Mississauga, ON: SR Research Ltd.
SR Research (2017). EyeLink data viewer user manual, version 3.1.97. Mississauga, ON: SR Research Ltd.
Swets, B., Desmet, T., Clifton, C., & Ferreira, F. (2008). Underspecification of syntactic ambiguities: Evidence from self-paced reading. Memory and Cognition, 36, 201–216.
Article
Google Scholar
Tan, M., & Foltz, A. (2020). Task sensitivity in L English speakers’ syntactic processing: Evidence for good-enough processing in self-paced reading. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 575847.
Article
Google Scholar
Toutouri, E. N., Dlogu, F., & Crocker, M. W. (2017). Specificity and entropy reduction in situated referential processing. In Proceedings of the 39th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 3356–3361).
Tyler, M. J., & Spivey, M. J. (2001). Spoken language comprehension improves the efficiency of visual search. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 1088–1093).
Vickery, T. J., King, L.-W., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5(1), 8.
Article
Google Scholar
Westerbeek, H., Koolen, R., & Maes, A. (2015). Stored object knowledge and the production of referring expressions: The case of color typicality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 935.
Article
Google Scholar