Baggio, G. (2018). Meaning in the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Book
Google Scholar
Baggio, G., van Lambalgen, M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Computing and recomputing discourse models: An ERP study. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.02.005.
Article
Google Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2008). An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension. Brain Research Reviews, 59(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.05.003.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I., & Schlesewsky, M. (2019). Toward a neurobiologically plausible model of language-related, negative event-related potentials. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(298), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00298.
Article
Google Scholar
Bott, O. (2010). The processing of events (Vol. 162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Book
Google Scholar
Brouwer, H., Crocker, M. W., Venhuizen, N. J., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2016). A neurocomputational model of the N400 and the P600 in language processing. Cognitive Science, 41(S6), 1318–1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12461.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Coderre, E. L., O’Donnell, E., O’Rourke, E., & Cohn, N. (2020). Predictability modulates the N400 in non-verbal narrative processing. Scientific Reports, 10, 10326. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66814-z.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cohn, N. (2013). The visual language of comics: Introduction to the structure and cognition of sequential images. London: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar
Cohn, N. (2014). You’re a good structure, Charlie Brown: The distribution of narrative categories in comic strips. Cognitive Science, 38(7), 1317–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12116.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cohn, N. (2019). Being explicit about the implicit: Inference generating techniques in visual narrative. Language and Cognition, 11(1), 66–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2019.6.
Article
Google Scholar
Cohn, N. (2020). Your brain on comics: A cognitive model of visual narrative comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 352–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12421.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cohn, N., & Foulsham, T. (2020). Zooming in on the cognitive neuroscience of visual narrative. Brain and Cognition, 146, 105634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105634.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cohn, N., Jackendoff, R., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2014). The grammar of visual narrative: Neural evidence for constituent structure in sequential image comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 64, 63–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.018.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cohn, N., & Kutas, M. (2015). Getting a cue before getting a clue: Event-related potentials to inference in visual narrative comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 77, 267–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.026.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cohn, N., & Kutas, M. (2017). What’s your neural function, visual narrative conjunction? Grammar, meaning, and fluency in sequential image processing. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(27), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0064-5.
Article
Google Scholar
Cohn, N., & Maher, S. (2015). The notion of the motion: The neurocognition of motion lines in visual narratives. Brain Research, 1601, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.01.018.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cohn, N., Paczynski, M., Jackendoff, R., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2012). (Pea)nuts and bolts of visual narrative: Structure and meaning in sequential image comprehension. Cognitive Psychology, 65(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.01.003.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Cohn, N., & Wittenberg, E. (2015). Action starring narratives and events: Structure and inference in visual narrative comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(7), 812–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1051535.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988). Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(03), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00058027.
Article
Google Scholar
Draschkow, D., Heikel, E., Võ, M. L. H., Fiebach, C. J., & Sassenhagen, J. (2018). No evidence from MVPA for different processes underlying the N300 and N400 incongruity effects in object-scene processing. Neuropsychologia, 120, 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.016.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Foulsham, T., & Cohn, N. (2020). Zooming in on visual narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01101-w.
Article
Google Scholar
Foulsham, T., Wybrow, D., & Cohn, N. (2016). Reading without words: Eye movements in the comprehension of comic strips. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 566–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3229.
Article
Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M. A., Varner, K. R., & Faust, M. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430–445.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hagoort, P. (2017). The core and beyond in the language-ready brain. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.048.
Article
Google Scholar
Hagoort, P., Brown, C. M., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 439–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308407585.
Article
Google Scholar
Hamm, J. P., Johnson, B. W., & Kirk, I. J. (2002). Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(8), 1339–1350. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00161-X.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Herman, D. (2009). Cognitive approaches to narrative analysis. In G. Brône & J. Vandaele (Eds.), Cognitive poetics: Goals, gains and gaps (pp. 30–43). New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
Hoeks, J. C. J., & Brouwer, H. (2014). Electrophysiological research on conversation and discourse. In T. M. Holtgraves (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology (pp. 365–386). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Huff, M., Meitz, T. G. K., & Papenmeier, F. (2014). Changes in situation models modulate processes of event perception in audiovisual narratives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 40(5), 1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273.
Article
Google Scholar
Huff, M., Rosenfelder, D., Oberbeck, M., Merkt, M., Papenmeier, F., & Meitz, T. G. K. (2020). Cross-codal integration of bridging-event information in narrative understanding. Memory & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01039-z.
Article
Google Scholar
Hutson, J. P., Magliano, J., & Loschky, L. C. (2018). Understanding moment-to-moment processing of visual narratives. Cognitive Science, 42(8), 2999–3033. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12699.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kendeou, P., McMaster, K. L., Butterfuss, R., Kim, J., Bresina, B., & Wagner, K. (2020). The inferential language comprehension (iLC) framework: Supporting children’s comprehension of visual narratives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 256–273.
Article
Google Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R. (2016). Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(5), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1130233.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kuperberg, G. R., Paczynski, M., & Ditman, T. (2011). Establishing causal coherence across sentences: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(5), 1230–1246.
Article
Google Scholar
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potential reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.
Article
Google Scholar
Laubrock, J., Hohenstein, S., & Kümmerer, M. (2018). Attention to comics: Cognitive processing during the reading of graphic literature. In A. Dunst, J. Laubrock, & J. Wildfeuer (Eds.), Empirical comics research: Digital, multimodal, and cognitive methods (pp. 239–263). New York: Routledge.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Leckey, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2019). The P3b and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13351.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Loschky, L. C., Hutson, J. P., Smith, M. E., Smith, T. J., & Magliano, J. (2018). Viewing static visual narratives through the lens of the scene perception and event comprehension theory (SPECT). In A. Dunst, J. Laubrock, & J. Wildfeuer (Eds.), Empirical comics research: Digital, multimodal, and cognitive methods (pp. 217–238). London: Routledge.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Loschky, L. C., Magliano, J., Larson, A. M., & Smith, T. J. (2020). The scene perception & event comprehension theory (SPECT) applied to visual narratives. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(1), 311–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12455.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Magliano, J. P., Dijkstra, K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1996). Generating predictive inferences while viewing a movie. Discourse Processes, 22, 199–224.
Article
Google Scholar
Magliano, J. P., Higgs, K., & Clinton, J. A. (2019). Sources of complexity in comprehension across modalities of narrative experience. In M. Grishakova & M. Poulaki (Eds.), Narrative complexity: Cognition, embodiment, evolution (pp. 149–173). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Magliano, J. P., Kopp, K., Higgs, K., & Rapp, D. N. (2017). Filling in the Gaps: Memory implications for inferring missing content in graphic narratives. Discourse Processes, 54(8), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.1136870.
Article
Google Scholar
Magliano, J. P., Larson, A. M., Higgs, K., & Loschky, L. C. (2015). The relative roles of visuospatial and linguistic working memory systems in generating inferences during visual narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 44(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0558-7.
Article
Google Scholar
Magliano, J. P., & Zacks, J. M. (2011). The impact of continuity editing in narrative film on event segmentation. Cognitive Science, 35(8), 1489–1517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01202.x.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Manfredi, M., Cohn, N., & Kutas, M. (2017). When a hit sounds like a kiss: An electrophysiological exploration of semantic processing in visual narrative. Brain and Language, 169, 28–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.02.001.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
Google Scholar
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1992). Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 99(3), 440–466.
Article
Google Scholar
McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of learning and motivation, 51, 297–384.
Article
Google Scholar
McPherson, W. B., & Holcomb, P. J. (1999). An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psychophysiology, 36(1), 53–65.
Article
Google Scholar
Michalon, O., & Baggio, G. (2019). Meaning-driven syntactic predictions in a parallel processing architecture: Theory and algorithmic modeling of ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 131, 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.009.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Neville, H. J., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 3(2), 151–165.
Article
Google Scholar
Nieuwland, M. S., Barr, D. J., Bartolozzi, F., Busch-Moreno, S., Darley, E., Donaldson, D. I., et al. (2020). Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: Evidence from a large-scale study using brain potentials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1791), 20180522. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0522.
Article
Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. (1992). Event-related potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 758–806.
Article
Google Scholar
Paczynski, M., Jackendoff, R., & Kuperberg, G. (2014). When events change their nature: The neurocognitive mechanisms underlying aspectual coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(9), 1905–1917. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00638.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., et al. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Polich, J. (2007). Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118(10), 2128–2148.
Article
Google Scholar
Pratha, N. K., Avunjian, N., & Cohn, N. (2016). Pow, punch, pika, and chu: The structure of sound effects in genres of American comics and Japanese manga. Multimodal Communication, 5(2), 93–109.
Article
Google Scholar
Rossion, B., & Caharel, S. (2011). ERP evidence for the speed of face categorization in the human brain: Disentangling the contribution of low-level visual cues from face perception. Vision Research, 51(12), 1297–1311.
Article
Google Scholar
Saraceni, M. (2016). Relatedness: Aspects of textual connectivity in comics. In N. Cohn (Ed.), The visual narrative reader (pp. 115–129). London: Bloomsbury.
Google Scholar
Sitnikova, T., Holcomb, P. J., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2008). Two neurocognitive mechanisms of semantic integration during the comprehension of visual real-world events. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(11), 1–21.
Article
Google Scholar
St. George, M., Mannes, S., & Hoffman, J. E. (1997). Individual differences in inference generation: An ERP analysis. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(6), 776–787.
Article
Google Scholar
Taylor, M. J., McCarthy, G., Saliba, E., & Degiovanni, E. (1999). ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(5), 910–915.
Article
Google Scholar
van Berkum, J. J. A. (2009). The neuropragmatics of “simple” utterance comprehension: An ERP review. In U. Sauerland & K. Yatsushiro (Eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: From experiment to theory (pp. 276–316). Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Google Scholar
van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Võ, M.L.-H., & Wolfe, J. M. (2013). Differential electrophysiological signatures of semantic and syntactic scene processing. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1816–1823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613476955.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. (2002). Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. Cognitive Brain Research, 13, 363–375.
Article
Google Scholar
Wittenberg, E., Paczynski, M., Wiese, H., Jackendoff, R., & Kuperberg, G. (2014). The difference between “giving a rose” and “giving a kiss”: Sustained neural activity to the light verb construction. Journal of Memory and Language, 73, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.02.002.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 35–62). New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123(2), 162–185.
Article
Google Scholar