Agarwal, P. K., & Bain, P. (2019). Powerful teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Agarwal, P. K., D’Antonio, L., Roediger, H. L., McDermott, K. B., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Classroom-based programs of retrieval practice reduce middle school and high school students’ test anxiety. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.002
Agarwal, P. K., Finley, J. R., Rose, N. S., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2017). Benefits from retrieval practice are greater for students with lower working memory capacity. Memory, 25(6), 764–771. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2016.1220579
Amir Kassim, A., Rehman, R., & Price, J. M. (2018). Effects of modality and repetition in a continuous recognition memory task: Repetition has no effect on auditory recognition memory. Acta Psychologica, 185, 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.01.012
Balas, E. A., & Boren, S. A. (2000). Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 9(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1637943
Balazs, C. L., & Morello-Frosch, R. (2013). The three R’s: How community based participatory research strengthens the rigor, relevance and reach of science. Environmental Justice, 6(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2012.0017
Baranczyk, M. C., & Best, C. A. (2020). How does instructor feedback help and hurt students’ academic performance? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000169
Barnes, J. V., Altimare, E. L., Farrell, P. A., Brown, R. E., Burnett, C. R, I. I. I., Gamble, L., et al. (2009). Creating and sustaining authentic partnerships with community in a systemic model. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 13(4), 15–29. https://openjournals.libs.uga.edu/jheoe/article/view/605/605
Bernacki, M. L., Vosicka, L., & Utz, J. C. (2019). Can a brief, digital skill training intervention help undergraduates “learn to learn” and improve their STEM achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000405
Bernstein, D. J., Addison, W., Altman, C., Hollister, D., Komarraju, M., Prieto, L., et al. (2010). Toward a scientist-educator model of teaching psychology. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.), Undergraduate education in psychology: A blueprint for the future of the discipline (pp. 29–45). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Blase, K. A., Van Dyke, M., Fixsen, D. L., & Bailey, F. W. (2012). Implementation science: Key concepts, themes, and evidence for practitioners in educational psychology. In B. Kelly & D. F. Perkins (Eds.), Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education (pp. 13–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., III., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014). Make it stick. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Buckley, J., & Doolittle, E. (2013). IES grant writing workshop for Development and Innovation projects. https://ies.ed.gov/funding/webinars/pdf/WODdevelopment_FY2013.pdf.
Buskist, W. (2013). Preparing the new psychology professoriate to teach: Past, present, and future. Teaching of Psychology, 40(4), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628313501047
Bywater, T. (2012). Developing rigorous programme evaluation. In B. Kelly & D. F. Perkins (Eds.), Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education (pp. 37–53). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chew, S. L., Halonen, J. S., McCarthy, M. A., Gurung, R. A. R., Beers, M. J., McEntarffer, R., & Landrum, R. E. (2018). Practice what we teach: Improving teaching and learning in psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 45(3), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628318779264
Colditz, G. A., & Emmons, K. (2017). The promise and challenges of dissemination and implementation research. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (pp. 1–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corral, D., Healy, A. F., Rozbruch, E. V., & Jones, M. (2019). Building a testing-based training paradigm from cognitive psychology principles. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(3), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000146
Daniel, D. B. (2012). Promising principles: Translating the science of learning to educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1, 251–253.
Daniel, D. B., & Chew, S. L. (2013). The tribalism of teaching and learning. Teaching of Psychology, 40(4), 363–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628313501034
Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2019). How cognitive psychology can inform evidence-based education reform. In J. Dunlosky & K. A. Rawson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529
Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Duda, M. A., Naoom, S. F., & Van Dyke, M. (2010). Implementation of evidence-based treatments for children and adolescents: Research findings and their implications for the future. In J. R. Weisz & A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (2nd ed., pp. 435–450). New York: The Guilford Press.
Fixsen, D. L., Blasé, K. A., Timbers, G. D., & Wolf, M. M. (2007). In search of program implementation: 792 replications of the Teaching-Family Model. The Behavior Analyst Today, 8(1), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100104
Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network. https://nirn.fpg.unc.edu/resources/implementation-research-synthesis-literature.
Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15, 451–474.
Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., et al. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6(3), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-005-5553-y
Ford, C., McNally, D., & Ford, K. (2017). Using design-based research in higher education innovation. Online Learning, 21(3), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v%vi%i.1232
Forman, S. G., Shapiro, E. S., Codding, R. S., Gonzales, J. E., Reddy, L. A., Rosenfield, S. A., et al. (2013). Implementation science and school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(2), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000019
Glasgow, R. E., Harden, S. M., Gaglio, B., Rabin, B., Smith, M. L., Porter, G. C., et al. (2019). RE-AIM planning and evaluation framework: Adapting to new science and practice with a 20-year review. Front Public Health, 7, 64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064
Glasgow, R. E., Huebschmann, A. G., & Brownson, R. C. (2018). Expanding the CONSORT figure: Increasing transparency in reporting on external validity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(3), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.044
Glasgow, R. E., Vogt, T. M., & Boles, S. M. (1999). Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: The RE-AIM framework. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1322–1327.
Green, L. W. (2001). From research to best practices in other settings and populations. American Journal of Health Behavior, 25(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.25.3.2
Green, L. W. (2008). Making research relevant: If it is an evidence-based practice, where’s the practice-based evidence? Family Practice, 25(suppl_1), i20–i24. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmn055
Griggs, R. A., & Jackson, S. L. (2017). Studying open versus traditional textbook effects on students’ course performance: Confounds abound. Teaching of Psychology, 44(4), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628317727641
Gurung, R. A. R., Richmond, A., Drouin, M., Landrum, R. E., & Christopher, A. N. (2019). The past, present, and future of scholarship of teaching and learning in psychology. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 5(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000143
Hall, B. L., & Tandon, R. (2017). Decolonization of knowledge, epistemicide, participatory research and higher education. Research for All, 1(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.18546/RFA.01.1.02
Halpern, D. F., & Hakel, M. D. (2003). Applying the science of learning to the university and beyond: Teaching for long-term retention and transfer. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(4), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380309604109
Harackiewicz, J. M., Canning, E. A., Tibbetts, Y., Priniski, S. J., & Hyde, J. S. (2016). Closing achievement gaps with a utility-value intervention: Disentangling race and social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), 745. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000075
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). Most people are not WEIRD. Nature, 466(7302), 29–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/466029a
Hsu, W.-Y., Zanto, T. P., van Schouwenburg, M. R., & Gazzaley, A. (2017). Enhancement of multitasking performance and neural oscillations by transcranial alternating current stimulation. PLoS ONE, 12(5), e0178579. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178579
Hulleman, C. S., & Cordray, D. S. (2009). Moving from the lab to the field: The role of fidelity and achieved relative intervention strength. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345740802539325
Hutchings, P., & Shulman, L. S. (1999). The scholarship of teaching: New elaborations, new developments. Change, 31(5), 10–15.
Jull, J., Giles, A., & Graham, I. D. (2017). Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: Advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implementation Science, 12(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3
Kelly, B. (2012). Implementation science for psychology in education. In B. Kelly & D. F. Perkins (Eds.), Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education (pp. 3–12). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kelly, B., & Perkins, D. F. (2012). Handbook of implementation science for psychology in education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kerr, N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(3), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4
Kirschner, P. A., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Do learners really know best? Urban legends in education. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.804395
Kotz, D., Viechtbauer, W., Spigt, M., & Crutzen, R. (2019). Details about informed consent procedures of randomized controlled trials should be reported transparently. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 109, 133–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.01.007
Lane-Fall, M. B., Curran, G. M., & Beidas, R. S. (2019). Scoping implementation science for the beginner: Locating yourself on the “subway line” of translational research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0783-z
Maclure, M. (2009). Explaining pragmatic trials to pragmatic policy-makers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(10), 1001–1003. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090076
Matlock, D. D., & Glasgow, R. E. (2017). Implementation science: How it can complement, extend, and challenge how you do science (and increase your success). https://www.re-aim.org/implementation-science-how-it-can-complement-extend-and-challenge-how-you-do-science-and-increase-your-success/.
McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4–5), 494–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440701326154
Michie, S., Fixsen, D., Grimshaw, J. M., & Eccles, M. P. (2009). Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: The need for a scientific method. Implementation Science, 4(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-40
Minkler, M., Salvatore, A. L., & Chang, C. (2017). Participatory approaches for study design and analysis in dissemination and implementation research. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (pp. 175–190). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moir, T. (2018). Why is implementation science important for intervention design and evaluation within educational settings? Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00061
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, & Medicine. (2016). Applying an implementation science approach to genomic medicine: Workshop summary (S. Addie, S. Olson, & S. H. Beachy, Eds.). The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23403
National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, & National Institutes of Health. (2011). Research dissemination and implementation (R18) grants. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/grants-and-training/policies-and-guidelines/research-dissemination-and-implementation-r18-grants.
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. In Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research, R. J. Shavelson, & L. Towne (Eds.), Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. National Academy Press.
National Science Foundation. (2019). EHR Core Research (ECR) Program Solicitation (NSF 19-508). https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2019/nsf19508/nsf19508.htm.
National Science Foundation, & Institute of Education Sciences. (2018). Companion guidelines on replication & reproducibility in education research. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2019/nsf19022/nsf19022.pdf.
Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J., & Simonsohn, U. (2018). Psychology’s renaissance. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 511–534. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836
Newcombe, N. S. (2002). Biology is to medicine as psychology is to education: True or false? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(89), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.43
Palinkas, L. A. (2019). Achieving implementation and exchange (1st ed.). Bristol University Press; JSTOR. www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv7r40sr.
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M. A., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
Paxton, A., & Tullett, A. (2019). Open science in data-intensive psychology and cognitive science. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218790283
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11421826
Petersen, C. A. (2007). A historical look at psychology and the scientist-practitioner model. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 758–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206296453
Potter, M. K., & Kustra, E. (2011). The relationship between Scholarly Teaching and SoTL: Models, distinctions, and clarifications. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2011.050123
Proctor, E. K., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., et al. (2011). Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
Rabin, B. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2017). Developing the terminology for dissemination and implementation research. In R. C. Brownson, G. A. Colditz, & E. K. Proctor (Eds.), Dissemination and implementation research in health: Translating science to practice (pp. 19–46). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Richlin, L. (2001). Scholarly teaching and the scholarship of teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001(86), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.16
Roediger, H. L., & Pyc, M. A. (2012). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 242–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.002
Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037559
Salehi, S., Burkholder, E., Lepage, G. P., Pollock, S., & Wieman, C. (2019). Demographic gaps or preparation gaps?: The large impact of incoming preparation on performance of students in introductory physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020114. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020114
Sawyer, K., & Dunlosky, J. (2019). How the learning sciences can inform cognitive psychology. In J. Dunlosky & K. A. Rawson (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cognition and education (pp. 17–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, M. (2018). Message from IES Director: A more systematic approach to replicating research. https://ies.ed.gov/director/remarks/12-17-2018.asp.
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & the CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLOS Medicine, 7(3), e1000251. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000251
Schwartz, D., & Lellouch, J. (1967). Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 20(8), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(67)90041-0
Science of Learning, National Science Foundation. (n.d.). Retrieved June 6, 2019, from https://www.nsf.gov/funding/pgm_summ.jsp?pims_id=5567.
Shapiro, D. (2002). Renewing the scientist-practitioner model. The Psychologist, 15(5), 232–234.
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366.
Sumeracki, M. A., Madan, C. R., & Weinstein, Y. (2018). Four Simple Strategies from Cognitive Psychology for the Classroom. In W. S. Altman, L. Stein, & J. E. Westfall (Eds.), Essays from E-xcellence in Teaching (Vol. 16, pp. 13–20). Washington: Society for the Teaching of Psychology. https://teachpsych.org/ebooks/eit2017/index.php
Sussman, S., Valente, T. W., Rohrbach, L. A., Skara, S., & Pentz, M. (2006). Translation in the health professions: Converting science into action. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 29(1), 7–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278705284441
Tabak, R. G., Khoong, E. C., Chambers, D. A., & Brownson, R. C. (2012). Bridging research and practice: Models for dissemination and implementation research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.024
The Improved Clinical Effectiveness through Behavioural Research Group (ICEBeRG). (2006). Designing theoretically-informed implementation interventions. Implementation Science, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-1-4
Thorpe, K. E., Zwarenstein, M., Oxman, A. D., Treweek, S., Furberg, C. D., Altman, D. G., et al. (2009). A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): A tool to help trial designers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 180(10), E47–E57. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090523
Wagenmakers, E. J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. A. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078
Walton, G. M., & Yeager, D. S. (2020). Seed and soil: Psychological affordances in contexts help to explain where wise interventions succeed or fail. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420904453
Weiner, B. J., Lewis, C. C., Stanick, C., Powell, B. J., Dorsey, C. N., Clary, A. S., et al. (2017). Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implementation Science, 12(1), 108. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3
Weinstein, Y., Madan, C. R., & Sumeracki, M. A. (2018). Teaching the science of learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0087-y
Willingham, D. T. (2009). Why don’t students like school?: A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. New York: Wiley.
Wilson-Doenges, G., Troisi, J. D., & Bartsch, R. A. (2016). Exemplars of the gold standard in SoTL for psychology. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2(1), 1–12.