Allen, H. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Matthews, P. M. (2008). A neural marker of content-specific active ignoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(2), 286–297.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Allen, R., McGeorge, P., Pearson, D. G., & Milne, A. (2006). Multiple-target tracking: a role for working memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(6), 1101–1116.
Article
Google Scholar
Allport, D. A., Antonis, B., & Reynolds, P. (1972). On the division of attention: a disproof of the single channel hypothesis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 24(2), 225–235.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Alvarez, G. A., & Franconeri, S. L. (2007). How many objects can you attentively track? Evidence for a resource-limited tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision, 7(13), 14 1–10.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Bergen, B., Medeiros-Ward, N., Wheeler, K., Drews, F. A., & Strayer, D. L. (2013). The crosstalk hypothesis: why language interferes with driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 119–130.
Article
Google Scholar
Breim, V., & Hedman, L. R. (1995). Behavioural effects of mobile telephone use during simulated driving. Ergonomics, 38(12), 2536–2562.
Article
Google Scholar
Cavanagh, P., & Alvarez, G. A. (2005). Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 349–354.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Emberson, L. L., Lupyan, G., Goldstein, M. H., & Spivey, M. J. (2010). Overheard cell-phone conversations: when less speech is more distracting. Psychological Science, 21, 1383–1388.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Fougnie, D., & Marois, R. (2006). Distinct capacity limits for attention and working memory. Psychological Science, 17(6), 526–534.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Glassbrenner, D. (2004). Cell phone use on the roads in 2002, Report no. DOT HS-809-580 (). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Google Scholar
Helleberg, J., & Wickens, C. D. (2003). Effects of data link modality and display redundancy on pilot performance: an attentional perspective. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 13, 189–210.
Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (1976). Verbal reasoning and working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 603–621.
Article
Google Scholar
Horowitz, T. S., Klieger, S. B., Fencsik, D. E., Yang, K. K., Alvarez, G. A., & Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Tracking unique objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(2), 172–184.
Article
Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Kunar, M. A., Ariyabandu, S., & Jami, Z. (2016). The down side of choice: having a choice benefits enjoyment but at a cost to efficiency and time in visual search. Attention, Perception and Psychophysics, 78, 736–741.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kunar, M. A., Carter, R., Cohen, M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2008). Telephone conversation impairs sustained visual attention via a central bottleneck. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(6), 1135–1140.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kunar, M. A., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Object-based inhibitory priming in preview search: evidence from the ‘top-up’ procedure. Memory & Cognition, 34, 459–474.
Article
Google Scholar
Kunar, M. A., Rich, A. N., & Wolfe, J. M. (2010). Spatial and temporal separation fails to counteract the effects of low prevalence in visual search. Visual Cognition, 18, 881–897.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Kunar, M. A., Shapiro, K. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2006). Top-up search and the attentional blink: a two-stage account of the preview effect in search. Visual Cognition, 13, 677–699.
Article
Google Scholar
Kunar, M. A., Thomas, S. V., & Watson, D. G. (2017). Time-based selection in complex displays: visual marking does not occur in multi-element asynchronous dynamic (MAD) search. Visual Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2017.1306006.
Kunar, M. A., & Watson, D. G. (2011). Visual search in a multi-element asynchronous dynamic (MAD) world. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(4), 1017–1031.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kunar, M. A., & Watson, D. G. (2014). When are abrupt onsets found efficiently in complex visual search? Evidence from multi-element asynchronous dynamic search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 232–252.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kunar, M. A., Watson, D. G., Cole, L., & Cox, A. (2014). Negative emotional stimuli reduce contextual cueing but not response times in inefficient search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 377–393.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lavie, N. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 451–468.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Levy, J., Pashler, H., & Boer, E. (2006). Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period? Psychological Science, 17(3), 228–234.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lleras, A., & Von Mühlenen, A. (2004). Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. Spatial Vision, 17(4–5), 465–482.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lochner, M. J., & Trick, L. M. (2014). Multiple-object tracking while driving: the multiple-vehicle tracking task. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76(8), 2326–2345.
Article
Google Scholar
Olivers, C., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2005). The beneficial effect of concurrent task-irrelevant mental activity on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 16(4), 265–269.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116(2), 220–244.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pashler, H., & O’Brien, S. (1993). Dual-task interference and the cerebral hemispheres. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19(2), 315–330.
Google Scholar
Pickrell, T. M., & Ye, T. J. (2009). Driver electronic device use in 2008, Report no. DOT HS-811-184 (). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. W., & Storm, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3(3), 179–197.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Russell, N., & Kunar, M. A. (2012). Color and spatial cueing in low prevalence visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1327–1344.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Smilek, D., Enns, J. T., Eastwood, J. D., & Merikle, P. M. (2006). Relax! Cognitive style influences visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 543–564.
Article
Google Scholar
Stock, G. (1985). The book of questions. New York: Workman Publishing.
Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Drews, F., & Crouch, D. (2006). A comparison of the cell phone driver and the drunk driver. Human Factors, 48, 381–391.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., & Drews, F. A. (2007). Cell-phone-induced driver distraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 128–131.
Article
Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001). Driven to distraction: dual-task studies of simulated driving and conversing on a cellular telephone. Psychological Science, 12(6), 462–466.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Sullivan, L. (1976). Selective attention and secondary message analysis: a reconsideration of Broadbent’s filter model of selective attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 26, 167–178.
Article
Google Scholar
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). Feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Watson, D. G., & Kunar, M. A. (2010). Visual marking and change blindness: Moving occluders and transient masks neutralize shape changes to ignored objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1391–1405.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Watson, D. G., & Kunar, M. A. (2012). Visual marking: determining the capacity of time-based selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 350–366.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Watson, M. R., Brennan, A. A., Kingstone, A., & Enns, J. T. (2010). Looking versus seeing: strategies alter eye movements during visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(4), 543–549.
Article
Google Scholar
Welford, A. T. (1952). The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high-speed performance - a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2–19.
Google Scholar
Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman, & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention, (pp. 63–102). New York: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomic Sciences, 4, 1–19.
Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual-search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419–433.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 1–7.
Article
Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. M., Oliva, A., Horowitz, T. S., Butcher, S. J., & Bompas, A. (2002). Segmentation of objects from backgrounds in visual search tasks. Vision Research, 42, 2985–3004.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. M., Place, S. S., & Horowitz, T. S. (2007). Multiple object juggling: changing what is tracked during extended multiple object tracking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 344–349.
Article
Google Scholar