Abrahamson, D., & Bakker, A. (2016). Making sense of movement in embodied design for mathematics learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 33.
Google Scholar
Alibali, M. W. & Nathan, M. J. (2011). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from students’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2011.611446
Atit, K., Weisberg, S. M., Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2016). Learning to interpret topographic maps: Understanding layered spatial information. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 2.
Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Battista, M. T. (1990). Spatial visualization and gender differences in high school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(1), 47–60. http://www.silccenter.org/aigaion2/index.php/publications/show/1482
Burte, H., Gardony, A. L., Hutton, A., Taylor, H. A. (2017). Think3d!: Improving mathematics learning through embodied spatial training. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2, 13
Chatterjee, A. (2010). Disembodying cognition. Language and Cognition, 2, 79–116.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Chemero, A. (2009). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Chu, M., & Kita, S. (2011). The nature of gestures’ beneficial role in spatial problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 102.
Article
Google Scholar
Clark, A. (1999). An embodied cognitive science? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(9), 345–351.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2001). Mindware: An introduction to the philosophy of cognitive science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Clifton, P. G., Chang, J. S. K., Yeboah, G., Doucette, A., Chandrasekharan, S., Nitsche, M., …Mazalek, A. (2016). Design of embodied interfaces for engaging spatial cognition. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 24.
Cooperrider, K., Gentner, D., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2016). Spatial analogies pervade complex relational reasoning: Evidence from spontaneous gestures. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 28.
Google Scholar
DeSutter, D., & Stieff, M. (2017). Teaching students to think spatially through embodied actions: Design principles for learning environments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 22.
Google Scholar
Dove, G. (2011). On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242.
Article
Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Frick, A., & Wang, S. H. (2014). Mental spatial transformations in 14- and 16-month-old infants: Effects of action and observational experience. Child Development, 85(1), 278–293.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
Article
Google Scholar
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1–55.
PubMed
Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Beilock, S. L. (2010). Action’s influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 664–674.
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Hayes, J. C., & Kraemer, D. J. (2017). Grounded understanding of abstract concepts: The case of STEM learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 7.
Google Scholar
Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 495–514.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Hsi, S., Linn, M. C., & Bell, J. E. (1997). The Role of spatial reasoning in engineering and the design of spatial instruction. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(2), 151–158.
Article
Google Scholar
Ishikawa, T., & Kastens, K. A. (2005). Why some students have trouble with maps and other spatial representations. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(2), 184–197.
Article
Google Scholar
Jaeger, A. J., Wiley, J., & Moher, T. (2016). Leveling the playing field: Grounding learning with embedded simulations in geoscience. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 23.
Google Scholar
Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2016). Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1080–1089.
Article
Google Scholar
Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., & Romanowicz, C. (2017). Embodied science and mixed reality: How gesture and motion capture affect physics education. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 24.
Google Scholar
Kastens, K. A., Liben, L. S., & Agrawal, S. (2008). Epistemic actions in science education. Basel: Proceedings of Spatial Cognition.
Book
Google Scholar
Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549.
Article
Google Scholar
Kiverstein, J. (2012). The meaning of embodiment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 740–758.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Marghetis, T., Landy, D., & Goldstone, R. L. (2016). Mastering algebra retrains the visual system to perceive hierarchical structure in equations. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 25.
Google Scholar
Marshall, P. J. (2014). Neuroscience, embodiment, and development. In W. F. Overton & P. C. Molenaar (Eds.), Theory and method. Volume 1 of the Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed.). Hoboken: Wiley. Editor-in-chief: R. M. Lerner.
Google Scholar
Michal, A. L., & Franconeri, S. L. (2017). Visual routines are associated with specific graph interpretations. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 20.
Google Scholar
Möhring, W., & Frick, A. (2013). Touching up mental rotation: Effects of manual experience on 6-month-old infants’ mental object rotation. Child Development, 84(5), 1554–1565.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nathan, M. J., & Walkington, C. (2017). Grounded and embodied mathematical cognition: Promoting mathematical insight and proof using action and language. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 9.
Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. Committee on the Support for the Thinking Spatially, National Research Council, Publisher: The National Academies Press, https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11019/learning-to-think-spatially.
Pallrand, G. J., & Seeber, F. (1984). Spatial ability and achievement in introductory physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(5), 507–516.
Article
Google Scholar
Ping, R., Decatur, M., Larson, S. W., Zinchenko, E. & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2012). Gesture-speech mismatch predicts who will learn to solve an organic chemistry problem. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 2012, Vancouver.
Shapiro, L. (2011). Embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Tran, C., Smith, B., & Buschkuehl, M. (2017). Support of mathematical thinking through embodied cognition: Nondigital and digital approaches. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 16.
Google Scholar
Tversky, B. (2009). Spatial cognition: Situated and embodied. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., …Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2009). Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 817.
Article
Google Scholar
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 625–636.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar