Ainsworth, S. E., Bibby, P. A., & Wood, D. J. (2002). Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 25–62.
Article
Google Scholar
Ainsworth, S. E., & Iacovides, I. (2005). Learning by constructing self-explanation diagrams. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of European Association for Resarch on Learning and Instruction, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Ainsworth, S. E., & Loizou, A. T. (2003). The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams. Cognitive Science, 27(4), 669–681.
Article
Google Scholar
Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 26, 1096–1097.
Article
Google Scholar
Alesandrini, K. L. (1981). Pictorial-verbal and analytic-holistic learning strategies in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 358–368.
Article
Google Scholar
Aleven, V. & Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 147–179.
Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20(5–6), 327–344.
Article
Google Scholar
Bradley, J. D., & Brand, M. (1985). Stamping out misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 62(4), 318.
Article
Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-Constructive-Interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1, 73–105.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., DeLeeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
Google Scholar
Craik, F., & Lockhart, R. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.
Article
Google Scholar
Edens, K. M., & Potter, E. (2003). Using descriptive drawings as a conceptual change strategy in elementary science. School Science and Mathematics, 103(3), 135–144.
Article
Google Scholar
Flick, L. B. (1993). The meanings of hands-on science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 4, 1–8.
Article
Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M., & Langston, W. E. (1992). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 129–151.
Article
Google Scholar
Gobert, J. D., & Clement, J. J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of causal and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 39–53.
Article
Google Scholar
Hall, V. C., Bailey, J., & Tillman, C. (1997). Can student-generated illustrations be worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 677–681.
Article
Google Scholar
Hausmann, R. G. M., & Vanlehn, K. (2007). Explaining self-explaining: A contrast between content and generation. In R. Luckin, K. R. Koedinger, & J. Greer (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Building technology rich learning contexts that work (pp. 417–424). Amsterdam: Ios Press.
Google Scholar
Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 18, 1084–1102.
Google Scholar
Hegarty, M., Carpenter, P.A., & Just, M.A. (1990). Diagrams in the comprehension of scientific text. In R. Barr, M.S. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 641–669). New York: Longman.
Google Scholar
Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1993). Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717–742.
Article
Google Scholar
Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition & Instruction, 21(4), 325–360.
Article
Google Scholar
Heiser, J., & Tversky, B. (2002). Diagrams and descriptions in acquiring complex systems. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Hmelo-Silver, C., & Pfeffer, M. G. (2004). Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions. Cognitive Science, 28, 127–138.
Article
Google Scholar
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the self-explanation principle to multimedia learning in a computer-based game-like environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1246–1252.
Article
Google Scholar
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Chemical Education, 61(10), 847–849.
Article
Google Scholar
Kessell, A. M., & Tversky, B. (2011). Visualizing space, time, and agents: Production, performance, and preference. Cognitive Processing, 12, 43–52.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. (2002). Revising the Visualizer–Verbalizer Dimension: Evidence for Two Types of Visualizers. Cognition & Instruction, 20, 37–77.
Article
Google Scholar
Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2002). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implication for chemistry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105–143.
Article
Google Scholar
Larkin, J., & Simon, H. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65–100.
Article
Google Scholar
Leutner, D., Leopold, C., & Sumfleth, E. (2009). Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 284–289.
Article
Google Scholar
Levine, M. (1982). You-are-here maps: Psychological considerations. Environment and Behavior, 14, 221–237.
Article
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E. (1989). Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 240–246.
Article
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. E., & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389–401.
Article
Google Scholar
Perkins, D. N., & Grotzer, T. A. (2005). Dimensions of causal understanding: The role of complex causal models in students’ understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 41, 117–166.
Article
Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249–255.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Roediger, H. L., Putnam, A. L., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Ten benefits of testing and their applications to educational practice. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 1–36). New York: Elsevier.
Google Scholar
Roscoe, R. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 534–574.
Article
Google Scholar
Schwamborn, A., Mayer, R. E., Thillmann, H., Leopold, C., & Leutner, D. (2010). Drawing as a generative activity and drawing as a prognostic activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 872–879.
Article
Google Scholar
Taber, K. S. (1997). Student understanding of ionic bonding: Molecular versus electrostatic framework? School Science Review, 78(285), 85–95.
Google Scholar
Tversky, B. (2011). Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 499–535.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Tversky, B., Heiser, J., MacKenzie, R., Lozano, S., & Morrison, J. B. (2007). Enriching animations. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation: Research implications for design (pp. 263–285). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Tversky, B., & Suwa, M. (2009). Thinking with sketches. In A. B. Markman & K. L. Wood (Eds.), Tools for innovation (pp. 75–84). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., et al. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 352–402.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Van Meter, P. (2001). Drawing construction as a strategy for learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 129–140.
Article
Google Scholar
Vandenberg, S. G., & Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental rotations: A group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual Motor Skills, 47, 599–604.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Wheeler, M. A., & Roediger, H. L. (1992). Disparate effects of repeated testing: Reconciling Ballard’s (1913) and Bartlett’s (1932) results. Psychological Science, 3, 240–245.
Article
Google Scholar
Wilkin, J. (1997). Learning from explanations: Diagrams can “inhibit” the self-explanation effect. In M. Anderson (Ed.), Reasoning with diagrammatic representations II. Menlo Park: AAAI Press.
Google Scholar
Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative processes of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 345–376.
Article
Google Scholar
Zacks, J., & Tversky, B. (1999). Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory and Cognition, 27, 1073–1079.
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar