Crisis-related stimuli do not increase the emotional attentional blink in a general university student population

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Table 1 Results for each analysis of variance ran in Experiment 1

Source	df^a	F	p	η_p²	BF_inc^b
All valence conditions × lag
Lag	(3, 117)	16.01	< .001	0.29	1.22 × 10⁹
Valence	(2.81, 109.65)	22.63	< .001	0.37	3.53 × 10¹⁴
Valence × lag	(8.05, 109.65)	4.47	< .001	0.10	3.48 × 10³
Unpleasant versus baseline × lag
Lag	(3, 117)	7.88	< .001	0.17	184.09
Valence	(1, 39)	42.47	< .001	0.52	6.91 × 10⁸
Valence × lag	(3, 39)	4.66	.004	0.11	6.61
Unpleasant versus neutral × lag
Lag	(3, 117)	17.95	< .001	0.32	7.72 × 10⁷
Valence	(1, 39)	13.68	< .001	0.26	141.08
Valence × lag	(3, 39)	4.86	.003	0.11	6.36
Harvey versus baseline × lag
Lag	(3, 117)	6.02	< .001	0.13	42.15
Valence	(1, 39)	0.46	.501	0.01	0.15
Valence × lag	(3, 39)	0.56	.644	0.01	0.06
Harvey versus Houston × lag
Lag	(3, 117)	3.04	.032	0.07	0.65
Valence	(1, 39)	0.03	.858	8.37 × 10⁻⁴	0.13
Valence × lag	(3, 39)	2.94	.036	0.07	1.17
Unpleasant versus Harvey × lag
Lag	(3, 117)	7.92	< .001	0.17	237.85
Valence	(1, 39)	37.38	< .001	0.49	2.26 × 10⁷
Valence × lag	(3, 39)	5.90	< .001	0.13	23.90
Simple main effects of lag
Unpleasant	(3, 117)	8.23	< .001	0.17	406.96
Neutral	(3, 117)	18.25	< .001	0.32	1.09 × 10⁷
Harvey	(3, 117)	4.41	.006	0.10	5.54
Houston	(3, 117)	1.42	.242	0.04	0.17
Baseline	(3, 117)	2.10	.105	0.05	0.38

All valence conditions include Unpleasant, Neutral, Harvey, Houston, and Baseline. The Unpleasant and Neutral images both contained humans. The Harvey and Houston images were matched Houston locations before and after Hurricane Harvey. The Baseline condition included an additional filler item
^aSome tests violated the assumption of sphericity and the degrees of freedom reflect Greenhouse–Geisser correction
^bBF_inc refers to the Bayes Factor in favor of including the effect, calculated across matched models