Skip to main content

Table 1 Mean (± 95% CI) proportions of correct and false recall and “old” recognition responses and signal detection indices for lists presented in Arial font and Sans Forgetica font in Experiments 1 and 2

From: Distinctive Sans Forgetica font does not benefit memory accuracy in the DRM paradigm

List type

Experiment 1A

Experiment 1B

Within recall

Between recall

Arial lists

Sans Forgetica lists

Arial lists

Sans Forgetica lists

N

43

44

50

Correct recall

.53 (.04)

.54 (.04)

.59 (.04)

.56 (.03)

False recall

.27 (.07)

.32 (.07)

.27 (.06)

.31 (.05)

# Intrusions per list

0.27 (.10)

0.26 (.12)

0.26 (.08)

0.22 (.07)

List type

Experiment 2A

Experiment 2B

Within recognition

Between recognition

Arial lists

Sans Forgetica lists

Arial lists

Sans Forgetica lists

N

45

58

58

List items

.70 (.05)

.70 (.05)

.70 (.04)

.66 (.04)

List item controls

.21 (.04)

.21 (.04)

.21 (.04)

 List item d

1.58 (.26)

1.58 (.24)

1.57 (.21)

1.42 (.18)

 List item λ

0.97 (.18)

0.97 (.17)

0.96 (.17)

Critical items

.66 (.08)

.65 (.08)

.70 (.06)

.66 (.06)

Critical item controls

.24 (.06)

.29 (.06)

.33 (.06)

 Critical item d

1.19 (.24)

1.16 (.24)

1.27 (.22)

0.99 (.21)

 Critical item λ

0.75 (.17)

0.66 (.19)

0.54 (.19)