Minimum requirements | Â |
Good arguments are given for why a new test is needed Good arguments are given for the content of the test Analyses are based on representative samples of at least 200 participants Data loss is handled in a principled way The selection of items is well explained Reliability of each scale is at least .7 in an independent validation study The distribution of scores from the validation study is given The test is easily available Raw data and analysis code of all studies are freely available in a repository | Â |
Additional marks of distinction | Â |
Samples of 400 participants and more Test reliability greater than .8 Factor analysis and/or IRT analysis of the test Evidence of convergent validity or criterion validity Test–retest reliability in addition to internal consistency |  |
Wrong criteria | Â |
A related test already exists The test must be validated on native English speakers | Â |