Table 1 Summary of reviewed studies
Study | Study type | Total sample size | Noticing rates by condition: |
|---|---|---|---|
Dixon et al. (2013) | Augmented reality | 32 | Overall (noticed something unusual): 12.5% (4/32) Standard endoscopy: 70.6% (12/17) (either object); 41.2% (7/17) (screw); 41.2% (7/17) (complication) Augmented reality: 6.7% (1/15) (either object); 6.7% (1/15) (screw); 0% (0/15) (complication) |
Dixon et al. (2014) | Augmented reality | 50 | Endoscopic with AR Navigation: 28% (7/25) (noticed something unusual); 60% (15/25) (screw); 0% (0/25) (complication) AR as a single display: 16% (4/25) (noticed something unusual); 32% (8/25) (screw); 4% (1/25) (complication) |
Hughes-Hallett et al. (2015) | Augmented reality | 73 | Wireframe overlay: 29% (7/24) (swab); 92% (22/24) (suture) Solid overlay: 20% (5/25) (swab); 88% (22/25) (suture) No overlay: 29% (7/24) (swab); 92% (22/24) (suture) |
High load: 8% (3/39) (swab); 90% (35/39) (suture) Low load: 47% (16/34) (swab); 91% (31/34) (suture) | |||
Marcus et al. (2015) | Augmented reality | 50 | No image guidance: 90% (9/10) Triplanar display: 40% (4/10) Always-on solid: 20% (2/10) Always-on wire mesh: 40% (4/10) On-demand inverse realism: 40% (4/10) |
Ann-Christin et al. (2018) | Radiology | 51 | (50%) density condition: 9.8% (5/51) (75%) density condition: 19.6% (10/51) (100%) density condition: 19.6% (10/51) |
de Cassai et al. (2021) | Radiology | 699 | 4.9% (34/699) |
Drew et al. (2013) Study 1 | Radiology | 24 | Radiologists: 16.7% (4/24) |
Drew et al. (2013) Study 2 | Radiology | 25 | Novices: 0% (0/25) |
Williams et al. (2021) Study 1 | Radiology | 50 | Breast cancer: 34% (17/50) Lymphadenopathy: 70% (35/50) |
Williams et al. (2022) | Radiology | 74 | Noticing rates not reported |
Al-Moteri et al. (2018) | Other | 40 | 65% (26/40) |
Greig et al. (2014) | Other | 142 | Overall: 23.9% (34/142) No training: 19.6% (11/56) Advanced: 23.3% (10/43) Expert: 30.2% (13/43) |
Ho et al. (2017) | Other | 77 | Head movement: 66.2% (51/77) Leaky CVC: 32.5% (25/77) |
Pandit et al. (2022) | Other | 28 | Noticing rates not reported |
Park and Kim (2021) | Other | 47 | Noticing rates not reported |