Table 4 The proportion of participants for whom BIC conclusively favoured each model for each experimental condition
From: How do humans learn about the reliability of automation?
Model | One | Two | Three | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High (%) | Low (%) | Start-high (%) | Start-low (%) | Constant (%) | Large drop (%) | Medium drop (%) | Small drop (%) | |
Experiment | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Two-kernel delta | 42 | 37 | 37 | 22 | 26 | 17 | 48 | 21 |
Delta | 15 | 15 | 11 | 17 | 9 | 22 | 13 | 5 |
Sampling (proportional to delta weights) | 6 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 26 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
Sampling (last/average) | 3 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 17 | 17 | 4 | 5 |
IIAB | 9 | 19 | 37 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 9 | 11 |
Bayesian | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Contingent Sampling | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
No updating | 21 | 30 | 7 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 26 | 47 |