Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Table 1 Choice frequencies from Experiments 1 and 2 of Wilson et al. (2019) and Dunn et al. (2022)

From: Toward a more comprehensive modeling of sequential lineups

Binary “yes”/“no” Judgments
Wilson et al. (2019)
	Target position
Response	1	2	3	4	5	6	Absent
“yes” to Position 1	579	137	127	123	132	125	766
“yes” to Position 2	2	450	98	82	91	93	539
“yes” to Position 3	9	7	391	108	109	89	554
“yes” to Position 4	14	15	9	331	67	62	488
“yes” to Position 5	21	7	5	2	229	53	305
“yes” to Position 6	9	6	9	8	5	214	232
Reject all	75	74	52	45	63	65	1267
Total	709	696	691	699	696	701	4151

Dunn et al. (2022)
	Target position
Response	1	2	3	4	5	6	Absent
“yes” to Position 1	701	119	104	122	90	106	185
“yes” to Position 2	8	626	68	75	68	62	94
“yes” to Position 3	7	10	631	72	47	91	99
“yes” to Position 4	11	10	12	532	63	63	86
“yes” to Position 5	17	12	6	6	485	53	87
“yes” to Position 6	15	12	11	9	10	421	79
Reject all	224	185	175	154	148	143	790
Total	983	974	1007	970	911	938	1420

The frequencies in bold font correspond to the correct responses. The frequencies in italic correspond to acceptances of a lure after the rejection of the target. The underlined frequencies (when expanded into confidence levels) are those used in the plotting of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) functions (see the right panel of Fig. 3). Please note that the frequencies from Wilson et al. (2019) exclude 153 participants with missing data

Back to article page