Prediction | Previous research | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Study | Finding | Operationalization | ||
EF | MW | |||
1. Executive functioning (specifically updating) predicts lower MW as concentration increases | Kane et al. (2007) | WMC predicts lower MW as concentration increases, t(122) =  − 3.98*** | Complex span tasks (z) | TUT |
 | Kane et al. (2017)a | WMC predicts lower MW as concentration increases, N = 274, z =  − 3.39*** Attentional restraint predicts lower MW as concentration increases, z = − 3.77*** Attentional constraint predicts lower MW as concentration increases, z =  − 2.59*b | Factor scores based on complex span and updating (working memory), restraint, and constraint tasks | TUT |
2. Executive functioning (specifically updating) predicts lower MW as guilty-dysphoric style increases | Marcusson-Clavertz et al. (2016) | WMC predicts lower MW as guilty-dysphoric style increases, t(87) =  − 2.90** | Symmetry span | SITUT |
3. Executive functioning (specifically inhibiting/common executive functioning) predicts lower MW as positive-constructive style decreases | Marcusson-Clavertz et al. (2016) | High-congruency Stroop effect predicts higher MW as positive-constructive decreases, t(87) =  − 1.99* | Stroop | SITUT |