Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of results for the key and other measures from radiology residents and certified radiologists for Experiment 1

From: Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search

  Radiology residents Certified radiologists Display type (2D vs 3D) Profession (Radiological residents vs certified radiologists) Interaction
2D 3D 2D 3D
Key measures
False alarm rate (%) 14.88 2.38 23.71 0.64 p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.57, BF10 = 3.34 × 104 p = 0.33, ηp2 = 0.04, BF10 = .39 p = 0.10, ηp2 = 0.10, BF10 = 1.16
Hit rate (%) 47.26 79.76 33.85 60.00 p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.39, BF10 = 1.96 × 102 p = 0.07, ηp2 = 0.12, BF10 = 0.87 p = 0.67, ηp2 = 0.01, BF10 = 0.39
Target- absent response time (s) 47.07 51.25 43.48 50.07 p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.36, BF10 = 19.67 p = 0.56, ηp2 = 0.02, BF10 = 0.52 p = 0.35, ηp2 = 0.04, BF10 = 0.49
Other measures
Timeout rate (%) 17.26 10.11 6.41 11.54 p = 0.70, ηp2 = 0.01, BF10 = .29 p = 0.44, ηp2 = 0.02, BF10 = 0.56 p = 0.03, ηp2 = 0.18, BF10 = 2.58
Correct rejection rate (%) 71.55 85.95 70.00 98.61 p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.27, BF10 = 14.17 p = 0.27, ηp2 = 0.06, BF10 = 0.50 p = 0.51, ηp2 = 0.02, BF10 = 0.40
Target- present response time (s) 20.46 26.53 18.16 27.39 s p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.38, BF10 = 29.46 p = 0.83, ηp2 = 0.00, BF10 = 0.39 p = 0.47, ηp2 = 0.03, BF10 = 0.45
  1. Trials where participants timed out were excluded for the hit rate and correct rejection analyses, trials where participants timed out or false alarmed were excluded from the target-absent response time analysis, and trials where a participant missed a target, timed out, or false alarmed were excluded from the target-present response time analysis