Skip to main content

Table 5 Study 1 Itemized analysis of the neuromyth statements

From: How essentialist reasoning about language acquisition relates to educational myths and policy endorsements

 

Item

College student sample

(N = 386)

Prolific adult sample

(N = 340)

Mean

SD

% Neutral

% Agree

Mean

SD

% Agree

1

Cannot access knowledge across languages

3.27

1.04

27.7

49.2

3.14

1.29

42.7

2

Compete for mental resources

2.38

.93

24.9

13.7

2.56

1.25

24.4

3

Should learn in a sequence

2.44

1.06

21.2

17.1

2.82

1.44

30.9

4

Cause language problems

1.92

.83

16.1

4.2

2.00

1.01

8.8

5

Delay language development

1.94

.86

16.1

5.4

2.09

1.16

12.9

6

Confuse children

2.27

.97

11.7

13.0

2.37

1.24

20.3

7

Impair cognitive ability

1.71

.81

7.8

3.9

1.97

1.13

10.6

8

Retained too long in bilingual classrooms

2.61

.81

48.7

10.1

2.60

1.10

20.0

9

Learn at the expense of English acquisition

2.15

.95

18.9

9.8

2.31

1.26

18.8

  1. Answer scale: 1–5 for the student and 1–6 for the adult samples