Fig. 5
From: Multiple expressions of “expert” abnormality gist in novices following perceptual learning
a and b Relationship between participants’ gist abnormality detection with the number of normal (left) and abnormal (right) images seen during learning, computed separately for self-reported guessing versus knowing. Black squares identify participants’ responses when they reported knowing, and the solid black line identifies the best-fitting line to these data. Gray circles and the gray line correspond to trials where the participants reported guessing. The more rapid the perceptual learning of the normal images (as indexed by less normal images seen before reaching learning criterion), the better the gist abnormality performance when participants reported knowing. No such relationship existed when participants reported guessing suggesting two separate gist processes