Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Table 2 One sample t-tests comparing the response bias shown by each training condition to 0, in order to determine whether the response bias differs statistically from neutral responding

From: Masked face identification is improved by diagnostic feature training

Training	Test	Mean (SD)	df	t	95% CI	p	d	BF₁₀
Diagnostic	Pre-^a	0.14 (0.37)	45	2.56	0.03, 0.25	.014*	0.38	2.94
	Post-	0.01 (0.37)	45	0.11	− 0.11, 0.12	.910	0.02	0.16
Control	Pre-^a	0.29 (0.44)	43	4.38	0.16, 0.43	< .001*	0.66	305.37
	Post-	0.11 (0.52)	43	1.44	− 0.05, 0.27	.157	0.22	0.43

^aA separate independent samples t-test confirmed that pre-training criterion did not differ between the two training conditions, t(88) = 1.76, 95% CI [− 0.02, 0.32], p = .081, d = 0.37, BF₁₀ = 0.86
*Identifies statistically significant comparisons

Back to article page