Skip to main content

Table 8 Linear regression models examining the relations between teachers’ spatial skills and the three types of spatial anxiety

From: What makes online teaching spatial? Examining the connections between K-12 teachers’ spatial skills, affect, and their use of spatial pedagogy during remote instruction

 

Model 4

Model 5

Model 6

 

b(SE)

B

p

b(SE)

B

p

b(SE)

B

p

Intercept

17.19(6.12)

 

0.01

18.82(7.09)

 

0.01

6.43(6.20)

 

0.01

MRT

− 0.35(0.16)

− 0.26

0.01

− 0.13(0.18)

− 0.10

0.49

− 0.05(0.16)

− 0.05

0.57

Gender

0.78(2.04)

0.04

0.70

− 4.65(2.37)

− 0.27

0.06

− 1.95(2.07)

− 0.13

0.67

Matrix

− 1.12(0.38)

− 0.38

0.01

− 0.32(0.44)

− 0.11

0.47

− 0.29(0.39)

− 0.11

0.58

TAI

− 0.05(0.13)

− 0.05

0.68

0.10(0.15)

0.10

0.52

0.25(0.13)

0.27

0.06

Credential

3.87(0.05)

0.24

0.04

0.05(2.22)

0.00

0.98

4.22(1.95)

0.30

0.03

R2

0.39

0.13

0.12

  1. B are standardized betas. Numbers in parentheses are standard errors. “Matrix” denotes the ICAR Matrix Reasoning assessment. “TAI” denotes the Trait Anxiety Inventory. “Credential” is teachers’ reported type of credentialing. The outcome variables for Models 4, 5, and 6 are teachers’ Mental Manipulation subscale score, Imagery subscale score, and Navigation subscale score in that corresponding order. Significant input variables at the p < 0.05 level have been indicated in bold font