Skip to main content
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
Fig. 2 | Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Fig. 2

From: Visual working memory for connected 3D objects: effects of stimulus complexity, dimensionality and connectivity

Fig. 2

Stimuli comparisons. Examples of typical stimuli composed of (a) isolated 2D items (Luck & Vogel, 1997), (b) geons (Wood, 2009), (c) stimuli used for studying conjunction (Luck & Vogel, 1997), (d) two-part objects (Xu, 2006), (e) STEM  stimuli depicting molecules and (f) the stimuli in the current study. Three-dimensional (3D) multipart objects are different from 2D isolated items in terms of both dimensionality and connectivity

Back to article page