Skip to main content
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Table 3 Correlations

From: Face processing in police service: the relationship between laboratory-based assessment of face processing abilities and performance in a real-world identity matching task

 

Gender

Education

Age

CFMT+

Hits

False alarms

Gender

–

.05

.18*

.12

 .02

− .16†

–

–

.11

− .01

.27†

− .06

Education

 

–

− .01

− .08

.06

.12

–

–

–

–

–

Age

  

–

.15†

.18*

− .04

–

.05

− .07

.18

CFMT+

   

–

.30***

− .06

–

.36*

− .37**

Hits

    

(.54)

− .17*

(.65)

− .08

False alarms

     

(.54)

(.65)

  1. The first row displays results of the first sample (N = 139), and the second row of the second sample (N = 47). Reliabilities (Cronbach’s alphas; Cronbach, 1951) are displayed in the diagonal in parentheses. †p < .10 two-tailed. *p < .05 two-tailed. **p < .01 two-tailed. ***p < .001 two-tailed. (-) No correlation could be calculated, because all subjects have the same education in Sample 2, because all subjects have a Bachelor’s degree
Back to article page