Table 3 Counts of correlations in specified ranges for item matrices across 12 studies
From: g versus c: comparing individual and collective intelligence across two meta-analyses
Correlation range: | −.20 to −.30 | −.10 to −.20 | .0 to −.10 | 0 to .10 | .10 to .20 | .20 to .30 | .30 to .40 | .40 to .50 | .50 to .60 | .60 to .70 | .70 to .80 | .80 to .90 | .90 to 1.0 | Count (total) | Weight (%) | % Positive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Woolley et al. (2010): Study 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5.85 | 100 | ||||||||
Woolley et al. (2010): Study 2 | 3 | 12 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 4 | 45 | 26.32 | 93.33 | |||||||
Engel, Woolley, Jing, Chabris, and Malone (2014a): Combined | 1 | 1 | 11 | 4 | 8 | 3 | 28 | 16.37 | 100 | |||||||
Engel, Woolley, et al. (2015a): Japan | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 8.77 | 100 | |||||||
Engel, Woolley, et al. (2015): Germany | 2 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 21 | 12.28 | 100 | ||||||||
Barlow and Dennis (2016) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 3.51 | 50 | ||||||||
Barlow (2015, unpublished doctoral thesis): Control Group (CG) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1.75 | 33.33 | ||||||||||
Barlow (2015, unpublished doctoral thesis): Experimental Group (EG) | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1.75 | 100 | |||||||||||
Bates and Gupta (2017): Study 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5.85 | 100 | ||||||||
Bates and Gupta (2017): Study 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 5.85 | 100 | |||||||
Bates and Gupta (2017): Study 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5.85 | 100 | ||||||||
Rowe (2019, unpublished doctoral thesis): Study 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5.85 | 100 | |||||||
Total Count: | 2 | 2 | 4 | 25 | 38 | 38 | 22 | 26 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 171 | 100.00 | |
Percentage (%) | 1.17 | 1.17 | 2.34 | 14.62 | 22.22 | 22.22 | 12.87 | 15.20 | 5.26 | 1.75 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.00 |