The social contagion of temporal discounting in small social networks

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Table 2 Direct and indirect social influence derived from the path model in Fig. 1

Dependent variable	Path	Path labeling (see Fig. 1)	Unstandardized coefficient (B)	Lower 95% CL	Upper 95% CL
Direct social influence
Ind X Post
	Ind Y Pre → Dyad XY	b × c	.43^a	.179	.824
Ind Y Post
	Ind X Pre → Dyad XY → Dyad YZ	a × d × f	.07^a	.018	.161
	Ind Z Pre → Dyad YZ	e × f	.13	− .015	.388
Ind Z Post
	Ind Y Pre → Dyad XY → Dyad YZ	b × d × g	.13^a	.033	.318
Indirect social influence
Ind Z Post
	Ind X Pre → Dyad XY → Dyad YZ	a × d × g	.07^a	.021	.187

CL confidence limit. Confidence limits derived from 95% bias-corrected bootstrap confidience intervals based on 10,000 resamples. The significance of the path coefficients (^a) was based on whether the confidence interval included zero or not