Skip to main content

Table 1 χ2 goodness-of-fit values for each dataset, presentation format and model

From: Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?

Dataset Simultaneous lineup Sequential lineup
SDT-MAX SDT-INT SDT-SEQ SDT-INT
Carlson, Gronlund, and Clark (2008, Exp 1) .01 2.29 2.01 11.48*
Carlson et al. (2008, Exp 2) 20.81* 36.53* .23 30.04*
Clark & Davey (2005, Exp 1) .39 .08 .06 .05
Clark & Davey (2005, Exp 2) .30 .03 1.14 .51
Greathouse and Kovera (2009) 9.23* 10.28* 2.91 .01
Kneller, Memon, and Stevenage (2001) 2.68 3.20 10.91* 13.17*
Levi (2006) .08 .72 .17 .10
Lindsay, Lea, & Fulford (1991) 1.24 1.39 .17 4.99
Lindsay and Wells (1985) 5.99 11.86* 6.74* 22.25*
MacLin & Phelan (2007) .37 .21 .02 .00
MacLin et al. (2005, Exp 1) .25 .22 1.41 1.39
MacLin et al. (2005, Exp 2) .61 .46 .00 .03
Melara et al. (1989) 1.14 1.18 .07 .01
Memon & Gabbert (2003) .31 .48 .05 .34
Parker & Ryan (1993) 1.38 4.33 .00 .27
Pozzulo et al. (2008) .03 .00 .00 .06
Pozzulo and Marciniak (2006) .09 .03 12.18* 13.75*
Rose et al. (2005) .49 1.62 .01 0.10
Sporer (1993) .66 .63 .63 .44
Steblay et al. (2011) .72 1.24 .00 .07
Wells & Pozzulo (2006) .47 .24 .59 .73
Wilcock et al. (2005) 5.34 5.56 .02 .17
  1. *Non-fitting datasets: asterisks indicate a significant difference from zero, α = 0.01 (critical value = 6.63)