Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Table 1 χ2 goodness-of-fit values for each dataset, presentation format and model

Dataset	Simultaneous lineup		Sequential lineup
Dataset	SDT-MAX	SDT-INT	SDT-SEQ	SDT-INT
Carlson, Gronlund, and Clark (2008, Exp 1)	.01	2.29	2.01	11.48*
Carlson et al. (2008, Exp 2)	20.81*	36.53*	.23	30.04*
Clark & Davey (2005, Exp 1)	.39	.08	.06	.05
Clark & Davey (2005, Exp 2)	.30	.03	1.14	.51
Greathouse and Kovera (2009)	9.23*	10.28*	2.91	.01
Kneller, Memon, and Stevenage (2001)	2.68	3.20	10.91*	13.17*
Levi (2006)	.08	.72	.17	.10
Lindsay, Lea, & Fulford (1991)	1.24	1.39	.17	4.99
Lindsay and Wells (1985)	5.99	11.86*	6.74*	22.25*
MacLin & Phelan (2007)	.37	.21	.02	.00
MacLin et al. (2005, Exp 1)	.25	.22	1.41	1.39
MacLin et al. (2005, Exp 2)	.61	.46	.00	.03
Melara et al. (1989)	1.14	1.18	.07	.01
Memon & Gabbert (2003)	.31	.48	.05	.34
Parker & Ryan (1993)	1.38	4.33	.00	.27
Pozzulo et al. (2008)	.03	.00	.00	.06
Pozzulo and Marciniak (2006)	.09	.03	12.18*	13.75*
Rose et al. (2005)	.49	1.62	.01	0.10
Sporer (1993)	.66	.63	.63	.44
Steblay et al. (2011)	.72	1.24	.00	.07
Wells & Pozzulo (2006)	.47	.24	.59	.73
Wilcock et al. (2005)	5.34	5.56	.02	.17

*Non-fitting datasets: asterisks indicate a significant difference from zero, α = 0.01 (critical value = 6.63)