Skip to main content

Table 6 Goodness of fit, badness of fit, and fit indices for each structural equation model

From: Elementary teachers’ attitudes and beliefs about spatial thinking and mathematics

 

One factor

Problem type (reclassified)

Problem context (reclassified)

Level of spatial thinking

Teaching difficulty

 CFI

.91

.91

.90

.93

 TLI

.88

.88

.88

.90

 RMSEA

.09

.09

.09

.08

 SRMR

.05

.06

.06

.05

 AIC

4583

4585

4583

4570

 ECVI

1.06

1.06

1.07

0.98

Spatial-thinking involvement

 CFI

.92

.92

.91

.93

 TLI

.90

.89

.89

.91

 RMSEA

.07

.08

.08

.07

 SRMR

.06

.06

.06

.06

 AIC

5108

5110

5110

5100

 ECVI

0.89

0.91

0.90

0.85

Visualization helpfulness

 CFI

.92

.92

.91

.97

 TLI

.90

.89

.89

.96

 RMSEA

.07

.07

.07

.05

 SRMR

.07

.06

.07

.05

 AIC

4821

4825

4826

4800

 ECVI

0.85

0.87

0.88

0.72

  1. CFI Comparative Fit Index, TLI Tucker Lewis Index, RMSEA Root Mean Square Error of Approximation, SRMR Standardized Root Mean Square Residual, AIC Akaike Information Criterion, ECVI Expected Cross Validation Index