Skip to main content

Table 2 The data analyzed by condition

From: Estimating the proportion of guilty suspects and posterior probability of guilt in lineups using signal-detection models

Reference

Condition

Label

N

Brewer and Wells (2006)

Low fairness, neutral instructions

BW,2006,LN

300

High fairness, neutral instructions

BW,2006,HN

300

Low fairness, liberal instructions

BW,2006,LL

300

High fairness, liberal instructions

BW,2006,HN

300

Carlson et al. (2016)

Shown weapon, short exposure

C+,2016,SS

337

No weapon, long exposure

C+,2016,NL

368

Shown weapon, long exposurea

C+,2106,SL

710

Carlson et al. (2017)

No weapon

C+,2017,N

409

Concealed weapon

C+,2017,C

418

Shown weapon

C+,2017,S

407

Gronlund et al. (2009)b

Fair lineup, innocent weak

G+,2009,FIW

317

Intermediate bias, innocent weak

G+,2009,IIW

308

Biased lineup, innocent weak

G+,2009,BIW

325

Fair lineup, innocent strong

G+,2009,FIS

312

Intermediate bias, innocent strong

G+,2009,IIS

320

Biased lineup, innocent strong

G+,2009,BIS

336

Fair lineup, guilty weak

G+,2009,FGW

320

Intermediate bias, guilty weak

G+,2009,IGW

316

Biased lineup, guilty weak

G+,2009,BGW

323

Fair lineup, guilty strong

G+,2009,FGS

314

Intermediate bias, guilty strong

G+,2009,IGS

310

Biased lineup, guilty strong

G+,2009,BGS

336

Kneller and Harvey (2016)

No alcohol

KH,2016,N

40

Alcohol

KH,2016,A

40

Placebo

KH,2016,P

40

Palmer et al. (2013)

Short exposure, short retention

P+,2013,SS

253

Short exposure, long retention

P+,2013,SL

218

Long exposure, short retention

P+,2013,LS

219

Long exposure, long retention

P+,2013,LL

218

Wetmore et al. (2015)c

Fair, innocent weak, short retention

W+,2015,FIWS

178

Fair, innocent strong, short retention

W+,2015,FISS

101

Biased, innocent weak, short retention

W+,2015,BIWS

184

Biased, innocent strong, short retention

W+,2015,BISS

107

Otherd, innocent weak, short retention

W+,2015,OIWS

111

Other, innocent strong, short retention

W+,2015,OISS

107

Fair, innocent weak, long retention

W+,2015,FIWL

176

Fair, innocent strong, long retention

W+,2015,FISL

115

Biased, innocent weak, long retention

W+,2015,BIWL

153

Biased, innocent strong, long retention

W+,2015,BISL

110

Other, innocent weak, long retention

W+,2015,OIWL

108

Other, innocent strong, long retention

W+,2015,OISL

113

  1. Note: Only a subset of these conditions are discussed in the text. The full set of results is provided on OSF
  2. aIncludes both the 3-s and 10-s weapon view. The culprit’s face was seen for 10 s in both conditions
  3. bTo perform the analysis, both guilty-suspect and innocent-suspect trials are needed. Both strength levels of the innocent or guilty suspects that were not fixed were included. All levels of video quality and suspect position were used
  4. cTo perform the analysis, both guilty-suspect and innocent-suspect trials are needed. The innocent weak/strong suspects were paired with the guilty strong suspects
  5. dDetails are not provided in Wetmore et al. (2015) or in the data regarding these instructions, but they were designed to be similar to police instructions, so were included