Table 1 The experimental data used in the analyses

Brewer and Wells (2006)

Single exp.

BW,2006

1200

8

0 to 100 by 10

11

Instruction fairness (biased, unbiased), foil similarity (low, high)

Carlson et al. (2016)

Single exp.

C+,2016

1415

6

0 to 1 by .1

11

Exposure duration (3 s, 10 s), weapon (present, absent)

Carlson, Dias, Weatherford, and Carlson (2017)

Single exp.

C+,2017

1234

6

0 to 100 by 10

11

Weapon (present, absent, concealed)

Gronlund, Carlson, Dailey, and Goodsell (2009)

Single exp. (simultaneous only)

G+,2009

1279

6

1 to 7 by 1

7

Video quality (good, poor), guilty strength (strong, weak), innocent strength (weak, strong), lineup fairness (unbiased, intermediate, biased), suspect position (2, 5)

Kneller and Harvey (2016)

Single exp.

KH,2016

120

6

1 to 7 by 1

7

Alcohol (control, placebo, mild intoxication)

Mickes (2015)

Exp. 1

M,2015,E1

302

6

0 to 100 by 10

11

–

Mickes (2015)

Exp. 2 (simultaneous only)

M,2015,E2

238

6

0 to 100 by 10

11

–

Mickes et al. (2017)

Single exp. (confidence ratings only)

M+,2017,E1

978

6

0–30 and 40 to 100 by 10

8

–

Palmer et al. (2013)

Exp. 1

P+,2013

908

8

0–20 and 30,100 by 20

5

Exposure duration (90 s, 5 s), retention interval (imm., 6–103 days)

Rotello, Guggenmos, and Isbell (2015)

Exp. 1 (simultaneous only)

R,E1

437

6

0 to 100 by 10

11

Suspect position (2, 5)

Rotello et al. (2015)

Exp. 2 (simultaneous only)

R,E2

521

6

0 to 100 by 10

11

Suspect position (2, 5)

Rotello et al. (2015)

Exp. 3 (simultaneous only)

R,E3

376

6

0 to 100 by 10

11

Suspect position (2, 5)

Wetmore et al. (2015)

Single exp. (simultaneous only)

W+,2015

1129

6

1 to 7 by 1

7

Retention interval (imm., 48 h), lineup fairness (biased, unbiased, other), innocence strength (weak, strong)