Skip to main content

Table 2 Literature measuring correlation for lineup accuracy

From: The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a Lineup Skills Test

Paper Predictor Outcome r N CI lower CI upper
Andersen et al., 2014 CFMT CP simultaneous lineup 0.26a 119 0.09 0.42
CFMT CA simultaneous lineup 0.28a 119 0.1 0.44
CFMT CP sequential lineup nsb 119   
CFMT CA sequential lineup 0.27a 119 0.09 0.43
Bindemann et al., 2012 Hit rate, Bruce 1-in-10 as memory task Probability of being a good witness (choosers) 0.7 37 0.49 0.83
Hit rate, Bruce 1-in-10 as memory task Probability of being a good witness (choosers) 0.83 86 0.75 0.89
FA rate, Bruce 1-in-10 as memory task Probability of being a good witness (nonchoosers) 0.49 43 0.22 0.69
FA rate, Bruce 1-in-10 as memory task Probability of being a good witness (nonchoosers) 0.38 99 0.2 0.54
Deffenbacher et al., 1978 Y/N face recognition overall accuracy 4-person simultaneous lineup of class exam administrators −0.28 45 −0.53 0.01
Hosch, 1994 BFRT Single lineup of experimenter (half CP) 0.54 32 0.24 0.75
BFRT Single lineup of experimenter (half CP) 0.39 38 0.08 0.63
BFRT Single lineup of experimenter (half CP) 0.41 27 0.04 0.68
Y/N face recognition sensitivity Single lineup of experimenter (half CP) −0.07 33 −0.4 0.28
Y/N face recognition sensitivity Single lineup of experimenter (half CP) −0.21 36c − 0.5 0.13
Y/N face recognition response bias Single lineup of experimenter (half CP) 0.5 33 0.19 0.72
Y/N face recognition response bias Single lineup of experimenter (half CP) 0.28 36c −0.05 0.56
Kantner & Lindsay, 2014 Y/N face recognition response bias 1 CP and 4 CA lineups 0.29 65 0.06 0.5
  1. BFRT Benton Facial Recognition Task, CA culprit absent, CFMT Cambridge Face Memory Test, CI confidence interval, CP culprit present, FA False alarm
  2. aChi-squared values converted to correlation coefficients at campbellcollaboration.org/escalc/html/EffectSizeCalculator-R5.php
  3. bNon-significant chi-squared value not reported in manuscript
  4. cSample sizes not reported, but are inferred based on reported p-values