Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of results for the other measures from professionals and non-professionals for Experiment 1

From: Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search

Other measures Professionals Non-professionals Display type Profession Interaction
2D 3D 2D 3D
Timeout rate (%) 12.04 10.80 1.34 4.57 p = 0.54, ηp2 = 0.01, BF10 = 0.25 p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.13, BF10 = 8.13 p = 0.17, ηp2 = 0.03, BF10 = 0.68
Correct rejection rate (%) 73.53 91.79 72.69 97.31 p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.40, BF10 = 2.35 × 106 p = 0.57, ηp2 = 0.01, BF10 = 0.30 p = 0.37, ηp2 = 0.02, BF10 = 0.45
Target-Present RT 19.36 s 26.94 s 21.70s 30.35 s p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.35, BF10 = 3.83 × 103 p = 0.22, ηp2 = 0.03, BF10 = 0.47 p = 0.75, ηp2 = 0.00, BF10 = 0.29
  1. The statistics reported are based off a 2 × 2 ANOVA comparing search performance on 2D and segmented-3D trials across professionals and non-professionals from Experiment 1