Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of results for the other measures from professionals and non-professionals for Experiment 1

From: Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search

Other measures

Professionals

Non-professionals

Display type

Profession

Interaction

2D

3D

2D

3D

Timeout rate (%)

12.04

10.80

1.34

4.57

p = 0.54, ηp2 = 0.01, BF10 = 0.25

p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.13, BF10 = 8.13

p = 0.17, ηp2 = 0.03, BF10 = 0.68

Correct rejection rate (%)

73.53

91.79

72.69

97.31

p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.40, BF10 = 2.35 × 106

p = 0.57, ηp2 = 0.01, BF10 = 0.30

p = 0.37, ηp2 = 0.02, BF10 = 0.45

Target-Present RT

19.36 s

26.94 s

21.70s

30.35 s

p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.35, BF10 = 3.83 × 103

p = 0.22, ηp2 = 0.03, BF10 = 0.47

p = 0.75, ηp2 = 0.00, BF10 = 0.29

  1. The statistics reported are based off a 2 × 2 ANOVA comparing search performance on 2D and segmented-3D trials across professionals and non-professionals from Experiment 1