Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Reaction Times for Correct Target-Absent Trials as a Function of Experiment and Condition

From: Eye movement feedback fails to improve visual search performance

Experiment Target-Present RT (Seconds) Target-Absent RT (Seconds) Independent Samples t Test (Two-tailed) Bayes Factor Strength of Evidencea Effect of Feedback
No Feedback Feedback No Feedback Feedback
1 15.11 (1.30) 20.84 (1.58) 30.79 (2.26) 37.84 (1.77) t(74) = −2.40, p = .02 Support for H1 2.31 Weak Increased quitting threshold
2 14.26 (1.67) 12.70 (1.24) 29.76 (2.15) 19.41 (1.64) t(63) = 3.90, p < .001 Support for H1 107.16 Strong Decreased quitting threshold
3 14.28 (0.97) 20.06 (1.55) 28.07 (2.16) 27.99 (1.87) t(83) = 0.03, p = .98 Support for H0 6.02 Some Had no effect
4a 4.87 (3.36) 5.62 (3.69) 5.52 (0.41)b 6.37 (0.44) t(72) = −1.42, p = .16 Support for H0 2.25 Weak Had no effect
4b 4.87 (3.36) 6.01 (3.36) 5.52 (0.41)b 6.92 (0.45) t(76) = −2.27, p = .03 Support for H1 1.77 Weak Increased quitting threshold
  1. RT Reaction time
  2. aCriterion based on Jeffreys (1961) as cited in Rouder et al. (2009)
  3. b Note: This condition is repeated in the table for consistency but represents a single condition in Experiment 4