From: Eye movement feedback fails to improve visual search performance
Experiment | Hit Rate | FA Rate | Corrected Accuracy (Hits − FAs) | Independent Samples t Test (Two-tailed) | Bayes Factor | Strength of Evidencea | Effect of Feedback | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No Feedback | Feedback | No Feedback | Feedback | No Feedback | Feedback | |||||
1 | 65.3% (3.8%) | 75.5% (2.8%) | 15.2% (2.6%) | 11.6% (1.5%) | 50.1% (4.6%) | 63.9% (3.1%) | t(74) = −2.43, p = .02 | Support for H1 2.48 | Weak | Improved performance |
2 | 65.9% (4.4%) | 53.4% (3.8%) | 9.2% (1.4%) | 10.0% (2.4%) | 56.7% (4.9%) | 43.4% (3.8%) | t(63) = 2.19, p = .03 | Support for H1 1.60 | Weak | Hindered performance |
3 | 71.0% (3.6%) | 59.1% (2.7%) | 21.9% (2.2%) | 27.0% (3.5%) | 49.1% (4.1%) | 32.1% (5.0%) | t(83) = 2.60, p = .01 | Support for H1 3.52 | Some | Hindered performance |
4a | 34.7% (4.1%) | 32.2% (3.6%) | 2.3% (1.8%) | 3.2% (1.7%) | 32.4% (3.9%)b | 29.0% (3.7%) | t(72) = .646, p = .52 | Support for H0 5.85 | Some | No effect |
4b | 34.7% (4.1%) | 36.9% (2.8%) | 2.3% (1.8%) | 6.4% (2.3%) | 32.4% (3.9%)b | 30.5% (3.2%) | t(74) = .393, p = .70 | Support for H0 4.66 | Some | No effect |