Skip to main content

Table 1 Measures of search performance by group with statistical comparisons

From: Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback

Experimental measure

Low-expectation group

High-expectation group

Statistical comparison

Total search time

   

Hard single-target misses

9.43 s (2.12 s)

13.74 s (2.40 s)

Z = 6.34; p < 0.001

Easy single-target misses

9.60 s (2.15 s)

13.35 s (2.70 s)

Z = 5.41; p < 0.001

Hard single-target hits

9.56 s (1.61 s)

9.03 s (1.58 s)

Z =  − 1.27; p = 0.20

Easy single-target hits

8.88 s (1.54 s)

8.43 s (1.70 s)

Z =  − 1.12; p = 0.26

Timeout rate

   

Hard single-target trials

4.72% (6.76%)

11.99% (6.74%)

Z = 4.95; p < 0.001

Easy single-target trials

2.46% (2.86%)

4.35% (3.82%)

Z = 2.73; p < 0.01

Dual-target trials

1.35% (2.72%)

1.17% (1.43%)

Z = 1.23; p = 0.22

Hit rate

   

Hard single-target trials

70.33% (11.67%)

82.56% (9.87%)

t(82) = 5.20; p < 0.001

Easy single-target trials

90.97% (7.02%)

94.46% (4.56%)

t(82) = 2.73; p < 0.01

Hard (dual-target trials)

64.89% (12.95%)

64.85% (15.38%)

t(82) =  − 0.10; p = 0.92

Easy (dual-target trials)

88.05% (7.16%)

86.80% (7.01%)

t(82) =  − 0.81; p = 0.42

Dual-target: Both Hit

56.16% (14.23%)

53.09% (18.76%)

t(82) =  − 0.84; p = 0.41

Hit response time

   

Hard single-target trials

5.40 s (0.84 s)

5.93 s (0.88 s)

t(82) = 2.80; p < 0.01

Easy single-target trials

3.28 s (1.02 s)

3.43 s (1.15 s)

t(82) = 0.64; p = 0.52

False alarm rate

   

Hard single-target trials

3.16% (6.46%)

5.84% (7.04%)

Z = 2.78; p < 0.01

Easy single-target trials

2.88% (6.65%)

3.30% (4.34%)

Z = 1.79; p = 0.07

Dual-target trials

2.31% (4.49%)

2.31% (3.04%)

Z = 0.39; p = 0.70

  1. Significant differences between groups are indicated in bold italics