Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of studies testing for benefits of mindfulnessmeditation on interference control

From: Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?

Study

Task

Duration.

# in exp.

# in control

Ran-dom

Active?

Decision

Training studies comparing trainees to controls

 Anderson, Lau, Segal, and Bishop (2007)

color Stroop

8 weeks 2 h/week

39

33

yes

waitlist

ns

 Colzato, Sellaro, Samara, and Hommel (2015)

Simon

17-min session

18

18

yes

open attention

ns

 Esch et al. (2017)

ANT

5 days 1.5 h/day

16

15

yes

no

ns

 Larson, Steffen, and Primosch (2013)

arrow flanker

14.5 min

28

27

yes

relaxation

ns

 Lai, MacNeil, and Frewen (2014)

ANT

15 min

23

21

yes

counting

ns

 Lim and Qu (2016)

ANT

15 min

41

39

yes

dance, sing, count

ns

 Norris, Creem, Hendler, and Kober (2018), Study 1)

arrow flanker

10 min

18

19

yes

reading

ns

 Norris et al. (2018), Study 2)

ANT

10 min

29

27

yes

reading

ns

 Oken et al. (2016)

flanker

6 weeks 60–90 min/wk

60

68

yes

waitlist

ns

 Oken et al. (2016)

color Stroop

6 weeks 60–90 min/wk

60

68

yes

waitlist

ns

 Polak (2009)

ANT

2 sessions 15 min each

50

50

yes

relaxation

ns

 Polak (2009)

color Stroop

2 sessions, 15 min each

50

50

yes

relaxation

ns

 van den Hurk et al. (2012)

ANT

8 sessions, 2.5 h each

34

37

yes

waitlist

ns

 Wahbeh, Goodrich, Goy, and Oken (2016)

ANT

8 weeks + 20 min of daily homework

27

25

yes

sitting quietly

ns

 Jha, Krompinger, and Baime (2007)

ANT

6 weeks, 3 h/class

17

17

no

waitlist

ns

 Ainsworth, Eddershaw, Meron, Baldwin, and Garner (2013)

ANT

3 days, 1 h/day focused att.

24

24

yes

relaxation

sig

 Ainsworth et al. (2013)

ANT

3 days, 1 h/day openness att.

25

24

yes

relaxation

sig

 Allen et al. (2012)

number Stroop

8 sessions, 2 h each

19

19

yes

selective listening

sig

 Becerra, Dandrade, and Harms (2017)

ANT

8 weeks, 24 min per wk

23

23

yes

waitlist

sig

 Elliott, Wallace, and Giesbrecht (2014)

ANT

week long retreat, 3–4 h/day

22

19

yes

waitlist

sig

 Fan, Tang, Tang, and Posner (2014)

Stroop color

5 days, 20 min/day

21

22

yes

relaxation

sig

 Felver, Tipsord, Morris, Racer, and Dishion (2017)

ANT

8 weeks, 90 min./week

24

23

yes

waitlist

sig

 Moore, Gruber, Derose, and Malinowski (2012)

Stroop color

16 weeks, 10 min/week

12

16

yes

waitlist

sig

 Quan, Wang, Chu, and Zhou (2018)

ANT

7 days, 100 min/day

24

24

yes

relaxation

sig

 Tang et al. (2007)

ANT

5 days, 20 min/day

24

24

yes

relaxation

sig

 Tang (2009)

ANT

4 weeks, 11 h total

  

yes

relaxation

sig

 Wenk-Sormaz (2005)

color Stroop

20 min,

20

20

yes

leaning

sig

 Baijal, Jha, Kiyonaga, Singh, and Srinivasan (2011)

ANT

1 to 2 years

79

76

no

 

sig

Study

Task

Experience

# in exp.

# in control

Ran-dom

Controls

Decision

Cross-section studies comparing meditators to non-meditators

 Andreu et al. (2017)

letter flanker

5 years

31

30

no

athletes

ns

 Jo, Malinowski, and Schmidt (2017)

ANT

13.1 years

22

23

no

 

ns

 Isbel and Mahar (2015)

ANT

at least 6 months

23

21

no

 

ns

 Otten et al. (2015)

ANT

min of 3 years

22

22

no

 

ns

 Schotz et al. (2015)

flanker

min of 3 years

20

20

no

 

ns

 Wei, Dong, Yang, Luo, and Zuo (2015)

ANT

14.6 years

18

22

no

 

ns

 Wittmann et al. (2015)

ANT

10 years

42

42

no

 

ns

 Moore and Malinowski (2009)

color Stroop

>  6 weeks

25

25

no

 

sig

 Sperduti, Makowski, and Piolino (2016)

ANT

25.5 years

16

16

no

 

sig

 Jha et al. (2007)

ANT

?

?

17

no

 

sig

 van den Hurk, Giommi, Gielen, Speckens, and Barendregt (2010)

ANT

14.5 years

20

20

no

 

sig

  1. Note. ns statistical test was not significant, sig statistical test was significant