You don’t have to tell a story! A registered report testing the effectiveness of narrative versus non-narrative misinformation corrections

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Table 2 Secondary contrasts run in Experiment 1

#	Contrast	Effect	F(1,768)	η ²_p	p
	Immediate
1	noMI < noC	Effect of uncorrected misinformation against no-misinformation baseline	360.89	.320	< .001*
2	noMI < NN	Continued influence effect of misinformation (non-narrative correction)	11.62	.015	≤ .001*
3	noMI < N	Continued influence effect of misinformation (narrative correction)	5.64	.007	.018*
4	noC > NN	Effectiveness of non-narrative correction relative to no-correction baseline	238.94	.237	< .001*
5	noC > N	Effectiveness of narrative correction relative to no-correction baseline	249.53	.245	< .001*
	Delayed
1	noMI < noC	Effect of uncorrected misinformation against no-misinformation baseline	195.86	.203	< .001*
2	noMI < NN	Continued influence effect of misinformation (non-narrative correction)	9.85	.013	.002*
3	noMI < N	Continued influence effect of misinformation (narrative correction)	9.29	.012	.002*
4	noC > NN	Effectiveness of non-narrative correction relative to no-correction baseline	118.81	.134	< .001*
5	noC > N	Effectiveness of narrative correction relative to no-correction baseline	111.30	.127	< .001*