Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Table 2 Results from three separate 2 (Face Race) × 2 (JOL type, Immediate vs Delayed) ANOVAs on d’ values, false alarm rates (FAR), and hit rates (HR)

From: Postdictive confidence (but not predictive confidence) predicts eyewitness memory accuracy

Exp.	Effect	d´			FAR			HR
Exp.	Effect	F	df	\( {\eta}_p^2 \)	F	df	\( {\eta}_p^2 \)	F	df	\( {\eta}_p^2 \)
1	Face Race	6.52^a	1, 189	0.03	5.77^a	1, 189	0.03	0.26	1, 189	0.001
	JOL type	10.44^b		0.05	5.75^a		0.03	1.39		0.01
	Face Race × JOL type	5.08^a		0.03	5.35^a		0.03	0.17		0.001
2	Face Race	42.15^c	1, 196	0.18	14.34^c	1, 196	0.07	21.78^c	1, 196	0.10
	JOL type	2.57		0.01	1.08		0.01	5.33^a		0.03
	Face Race × JOL type	2.62		0.01	0.03		< 0.001	2.83		0.01

df degrees of freedom per test
Effect sizes reported are partial-eta squared. These statistics indicate that on all three measures of recognition memory accuracy, the effect size for the Cross-Race Effect was greater in Experiment 2 than Experiment 1
^ap < 0.05, ^bp < 0.01, ^cp < 0.001

Back to article page