Skip to main content
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

Table 4 Summary of results for the other measures for non-professionals from Experiment 2

From: Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search

Other measures

Experiment 2

Non-professionals

Display type comparison

2D

3D

Timeout rate (%)

0.43

1.58

t(28) = 2.12, p = 0.04, BF10 = 1.36

Correct rejection rate (%)

68.21

86.03

t(28) = 5.72, p < 0.001, BF10 = 5.08 × 103

Target-present response time (s)

17.88

25.37

t(28) = 4.91, p < 0.001, BF10 = 6.73 × 102

  1. The statistics reported are based on t-tests comparing search performance on 2D and segmented-3D displays. There was a higher timeout rate, a higher correct rejection rate, and a longer average response time on target-present trials for segmented-3D displays compared to 2D displays
Back to article page