Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of results for the key and other measures from radiology residents and certified radiologists for Experiment 1

From: Mammography to tomosynthesis: examining the differences between two-dimensional and segmented-three-dimensional visual search

 

Radiology residents

Certified radiologists

Display type (2D vs 3D)

Profession (Radiological residents vs certified radiologists)

Interaction

2D

3D

2D

3D

Key measures

False alarm rate (%)

14.88

2.38

23.71

0.64

p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.57, BF10 = 3.34 × 104

p = 0.33, ηp2 = 0.04, BF10 = .39

p = 0.10, ηp2 = 0.10, BF10 = 1.16

Hit rate (%)

47.26

79.76

33.85

60.00

p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.39, BF10 = 1.96 × 102

p = 0.07, ηp2 = 0.12, BF10 = 0.87

p = 0.67, ηp2 = 0.01, BF10 = 0.39

Target- absent response time (s)

47.07

51.25

43.48

50.07

p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.36, BF10 = 19.67

p = 0.56, ηp2 = 0.02, BF10 = 0.52

p = 0.35, ηp2 = 0.04, BF10 = 0.49

Other measures

Timeout rate (%)

17.26

10.11

6.41

11.54

p = 0.70, ηp2 = 0.01, BF10 = .29

p = 0.44, ηp2 = 0.02, BF10 = 0.56

p = 0.03, ηp2 = 0.18, BF10 = 2.58

Correct rejection rate (%)

71.55

85.95

70.00

98.61

p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.27, BF10 = 14.17

p = 0.27, ηp2 = 0.06, BF10 = 0.50

p = 0.51, ηp2 = 0.02, BF10 = 0.40

Target- present response time (s)

20.46

26.53

18.16

27.39 s

p < 0.01, ηp2 = 0.38, BF10 = 29.46

p = 0.83, ηp2 = 0.00, BF10 = 0.39

p = 0.47, ηp2 = 0.03, BF10 = 0.45

  1. Trials where participants timed out were excluded for the hit rate and correct rejection analyses, trials where participants timed out or false alarmed were excluded from the target-absent response time analysis, and trials where a participant missed a target, timed out, or false alarmed were excluded from the target-present response time analysis