Table 3 Reaction Times for Correct Target-Absent Trials as a Function of Experiment and Condition
From: Eye movement feedback fails to improve visual search performance
Experiment | Target-Present RT (Seconds) | Target-Absent RT (Seconds) | Independent Samples t Test (Two-tailed) | Bayes Factor | Strength of Evidencea | Effect of Feedback | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No Feedback | Feedback | No Feedback | Feedback | |||||
1 | 15.11 (1.30) | 20.84 (1.58) | 30.79 (2.26) | 37.84 (1.77) | t(74) = −2.40, p = .02 | Support for H1 2.31 | Weak | Increased quitting threshold |
2 | 14.26 (1.67) | 12.70 (1.24) | 29.76 (2.15) | 19.41 (1.64) | t(63) = 3.90, p < .001 | Support for H1 107.16 | Strong | Decreased quitting threshold |
3 | 14.28 (0.97) | 20.06 (1.55) | 28.07 (2.16) | 27.99 (1.87) | t(83) = 0.03, p = .98 | Support for H0 6.02 | Some | Had no effect |
4a | 4.87 (3.36) | 5.62 (3.69) | 5.52 (0.41)b | 6.37 (0.44) | t(72) = −1.42, p = .16 | Support for H0 2.25 | Weak | Had no effect |
4b | 4.87 (3.36) | 6.01 (3.36) | 5.52 (0.41)b | 6.92 (0.45) | t(76) = −2.27, p = .03 | Support for H1 1.77 | Weak | Increased quitting threshold |